Was there discussion on this some where? I can't find it but like to see it if there is, may persuade me if someone is passionate about one or the other. I personally don't care. Never have a owners muster up enough to veto a trade, also been lucky enough never to have collusion in a league that I know of.
aaawall91 wrote:Was there discussion on this some where? I can't find it but like to see it if there is, may persuade me if someone is passionate about one or the other. I personally don't care. Never have a owners muster up enough to veto a trade, also been lucky enough never to have collusion in a league that I know of.
Not really. I am not a fan of the league vote for trades and I am just going through the rules and proposing changes I would like to see since we are doing it for other things.
We would use to secondary owners used solely for trade vetoes.
If myself and one other owner are involved in a trade, teh co-commish and 1 of the secondary owners would pass it.
If both co-commishes were involved then BOTH secondary owners would have sole veto power.
I essentially would like to see zero trades ever vetoed. It is a dynasty league. Build how you want and build the team you want. Who am I to judge the deal. The only time I will ever veto a deal is collusion. AD for 4 projects and picks will be passed by me.
stomperrob wrote:Commish - not talking about this league in particular, but some owners use their veto for the wrong reasons.
Agree 100%. I answer a lot of questions int eh commish forum...should this get vetoed. 99 times out of 100 the answer is no. You do not vote down a trade because it makes another team stronger than yours. You do not veto a deal that will help another team in 2-3 years instead of right now. You play in a Yahoo public league, fine, let em vote. You play in a Cafe league with for the most part extremely knowledgeable owners, you let it fly. LS2 knows more about college football then I ever will, if he chooses to deal elite player A for project players B, C, D then I am not going to stop him.
just my opinion. I have played FF for 15+ years, maybe closer to 20 now and I have vetoed exactly 1 deal.
I think there shouldn't be any veto, persay, but rather that each trade takes a day, maybe two, to process. Then if somebody has a problem with it, they can raise the issue and we'll hold up on putting the trade through if needed.
I'm really against vetoing any trade, ever, unless it's incredibly obvious collusion or tanking.
Fourth and Inches (Dynasty) Zealots: 4, 39, 56 Cafe Very Special Forces (Dynasty) General Manager Wannabees Frozen Tundra (Dynasty)
Instinctive wrote:I think there shouldn't be any veto, persay, but rather that each trade takes a day, maybe two, to process. Then if somebody has a problem with it, they can raise the issue and we'll hold up on putting the trade through if needed.
I'm really against vetoing any trade, ever, unless it's incredibly obvious collusion or tanking.
Cafe Home
Fantasy Baseball
Fantasy Basketball
Fantasy Hockey
by bungle613 » Fri Jul 16, 2010 9:06 pm 
