put these RB's in their ideal DRAFT ORDER!!

[billsalltheway2003]

8 team league

1pt per reception
1pt for every 10 rushing yds
1pt for every 15 receiving yds
6pts for a td

Rank these backs in order of who should be drafted first and why

Marshall Faulk
Priest Holmes
Clinton Portis
Deuce McCallister

[hayesb26]

1.portis-young, good oline
2.deuce-takes a bruising, injuryprone
3.marshall-high risk high reward, rams improve oline
4.priest-" " if healthy, #1

[slowkidz]

tough call....

in an ideal world where everyone is healthy and starts....

1. Priest
2. Portis
3. Faulk
4. Deuce

in the real world that is full of questions...

1. Portis
2. Deuce
3. Faulk - could go to 2nd if Pace resigns...
4. Priest - if found healthy, he should jump up to 1st on this list

[Poobah]

Today, my answer is:

Portis - could be better than his rookie year
Faulk - still scores lots of TDs
Deuce - great offense, shed that injury label
Priest - definitely right behind these 3, but who knows WHAT'S up with him right now

[Flux]

Priest
Faulk
Portis
Deuce

[schachterGOFINS]

Portis - Healthy, young den likes the run
Faulk - gonna have a good year but wont put up numbers like he did in 2002
Deuce - same as portis but NO spreds the ball alot and doesnt have the talent portis does
Preist - hes not worth a early first round pick b/c of hip

[Vikes Rule 88]

Faulk
Portis
Duece
Priest

[Homeless]

So there you have it billsalltheway2003, I hope we cleared that up for you

[terpfan]

ill second the portis, deuce, faulk, priest order.

[Adlaw]

Holmes, Portis, Faulk, Duece, and the rest of the world