DUKE wrote:I think a supporting cast is very important for fantasy #'s, and Plummer has the cast. A stud running back, a great line, a great pass catching TE, and good WR's. If he would've landed in Chicago I would want nothing to do with him, but in Denver he could end up doing very well.
still cant believe it myself...but i'm agreeing with the bungle fan...
DUKE wrote:I think a supporting cast is very important for fantasy #'s, and Plummer has the cast. A stud running back, a great line, a great pass catching TE, and good WR's. If he would've landed in Chicago I would want nothing to do with him, but in Denver he could end up doing very well.
Duke, you summed it up well! If Plummer stinks it up in Denver, he should hang his cleats up! I'd expect half the posters here would manage a couple wins at QB with that team!
I think he will do great considering he didn't have much to work with in Arizona and managed to keep his job. Jake is still mobile (he's lucky he still has legs) and that is a plus! I don't think he'll get hurt on his days off either! Griese burned some bridges in Denver on and off the field. Jake will make it work.
This guy was not completely without talent in Arizona. I saw Kitna ring up some good numbers for a bad Bengals team last year, and Johnson is a fine receiver, but I don't think anyone here would say that the Bengals are stacked.
This year, with the QB's available, he is a backup only, right now. He might rip it up, but top 5 next year? Ahhh, no.
DUKE wrote:I think a supporting cast is very important for fantasy #'s, and Plummer has the cast. A stud running back, a great line, a great pass catching TE, and good WR's. If he would've landed in Chicago I would want nothing to do with him, but in Denver he could end up doing very well.
still cant believe it myself...but i'm agreeing with the bungle fan...
What's up with that Slow? You've been doing that a lot lately. I'm starting to get worried.
I'd say that Plummer is still fantasy backup material, but he does have the potential to be a solid starter. He would be a decent pick. I am trying to figure out who to rank higher, him, Matt Hasselbeck, or Tommy Maddox. All three have a high potential for success this year, but odds are only one of them will actually live up to that potential. Let's hope I pick the right one.
The snake should be a late round, 6-8th , pickup. He could be a real sleeper, but I worry over him getting Shanahan’s complex playbook early in the year. And he may go into shock the first time one of his Rbs picks up a blitz!
I think, therefore I am. I think fantasy, therefore I am unreal?
moochman
Hall of Fame Hero
Posts: 16216
(Past Year: 848)
Joined: 20 Jul 2003
Yards this season: 568
Home Cafe: Football
Location: Living in the shame only a Lions fan knows
I would rank both Hasselbeck and Maddox ahead of Plummer. Steelers and Hawks are both more pass oriented now and their receiving cores are both better. Hasselbeck and Maddox both have potential (and did) to turn out huge games. I don't know if I see Jake throwing a couple 350 yd 3 or 4 TD games.
Azrael
Hall of Fame Hero
Posts: 8275
(Past Year: 20)
Joined: 29 Jun 2003
Yards this season: 24
Home Cafe: Football
Location: Keeping da cafe sucka free for 9 years straight