by moochman » Tue Jul 29, 2003 8:52 am
[quote="Confluence"]Faulk's best years are behind him. Most of his career has been played on turf, and now he is starting to show the effects of that. quote]
Of course no one would pick a player bases solely on the strength of schedule in the last weeks. It is, however, one more facet to consider and may be the deciding factor, all things being equal. Also, Faulk is only 29 years old. I know that is mature for a rb, but great runners have longevity. And as far as I know there were some pretty good rbs that played on turf. Hmm…lets see…Sanders, Smith, Dickerson…They all had injuries along the way.
I think, therefore I am. I think fantasy, therefore I am unreal?