torry holt for david boston?

[Guest]

Is Holt for Boston straight up an even trade, regardless of what the lineups are. Or would one be giving up a little more one way or another. Any advice would help

[SolarfluX]

With both Warner and Plummer slumping, neither are producing as they normally should. At this point, I'd rather have Holt, but it's a 'six of one, half-a-dozen of the other' kinda deal...

[Helm]

I agree with SolarFlux, however keep in mind that the only go to guy in for the cards is Boston. It is a committee at WR for the RAMS. I would rather (and do) have Boston.

Helm

[kashikis]

id rather have boston because the cards are always behind and boston is big enough to outplay any corner so he will always get his touches and since hes the only weapon they have hes more consistant