work4beerz wrote:Because your statements are just wrong.
Winning with backups?
3 and 5 a winning record. Not Quite.
My statements are wrong about having all your money in one position? Why would you pay 2 QBs huge money? How does that make sense?
All I said is that all 3 teams won last week w/ subpar QBs. I never said they were playoff bound. I like how you pick and choose what to respond to though, nice touch
Fact of the matter is, the NFL is a business. If you invest money into a player/position, you are pretty much obligated to stick w/ them. In WAS they gave up a TON of money to Brunell, who obviously is not playing well at all. He does not deserve to be in there, but if they put in Ramsey or Tim Hasselbeck, the entire organization looks foolish on their investment. WAS is also plagued w/ an injured o-line, and they are running a new system compared to last year.
BUF is geared toward the future and already traded next years 1st rd pick for Losman. No way they try and get Brees, thats nonsense considering they are paying Losman 1st rd money and Brees would demand a huge contract.
CHI also spent a 1st rd pick in Grossman, they are learning a new system there as well. You have to cut teams/QBs breaks when they are thrown into a completely new situation.
If you put all this money into 2 players you are killing your team elsewhere.
1) Will these teams even have the money to pay Brees?
2) Do they have other needs that would better benefit their teams?
3) Do they already have a capable QB or replacement?
4) Do they have the time/patience for Brees to learn their system?
These are the important questions to ask and quite frankly, for those 3 teams, it just doesnt make sense.