I think you guys have all done a solid job of looking at the question of whether or not this team owner correctly handled the roster change. But, at the risk of expressing an extremely unpopular opinion, I think that you should never want to win a game against a person who is starting players on bye weeks. We have one owner who has basically checked out of doing any roster moves and he had 4 of his 8 positions filled with guys on a bye week coming into his game against me this weekend. I didn't think it was appropriate for my team to win a game that way (or perhaps lose in the most humiliating fashion possible) so I contacted the league commishioner who made the changes in the starting lineup. Keep in mind that all 4 positions in the starting lineup were filled with players already on this team's bench. Inserting guys who are playing games from your bench to the starting lineup to replace guys who are on bye weeks is an elementary move in fantasy football. Imo, if Drew Brees was on this guy's bench and his starter (Vick) was on bye, then this should have been considered an automatic change. I do see the point of punishing people who fail to make these moves, but if he is claiming that he tried to get it done, there is no reason to believe that it shouldn't be fixed. Just what I think based on my experiences, but I understand different leagues are built in different ways.