Fantasy Football Cafe Forum

by **Lightzout36** » Sat Nov 13, 2004 4:51 pm

Seems like this is a good prediction but what happen to LT2 when he played the saints. He didnt get hardly any rushing yards. I know brees threw alot but everytime LT touched the ball he was held to a short gain.

Anyone else have something to say?

by **ljthockey** » Sat Nov 13, 2004 4:54 pm

You are aware that New Orleans is 3rd to last in the NFL in rushing defense you just specified one game overall there a terrible run D and KC's line is beter than San Diegos

by **Lightzout36** » Sat Nov 13, 2004 4:58 pm

yea i realized that but LT is a much better back than blaylock thats why i was concerned

by **mad benjamin** » Sat Nov 13, 2004 5:27 pm

LT2 has also been hampered by a sore groin all year.

by **Ironhorse75** » Sat Nov 13, 2004 5:34 pm

I'm more concerned with the 3 man rotation than the defense actually stopping them.

by **gatorman1122** » Sat Nov 13, 2004 6:10 pm

I thought about this also....I wrote this in a previous post

I just took a look at some of the stats for the Saints's games for the last 4 weeks (they had a bye week)
NO has allowed only ONE rushing TD (courtesy of LT) and no 100 yd rushers...Most of the points that teams score against them come through the air....

by **mad benjamin** » Sat Nov 13, 2004 10:36 pm

Yeah, Blaylock may not go off. There's no guarantee's w/ anyone, but I think you can out-think yourself by reading too much into some matchups. The Saints are one of the weaker defenses and KC is one of the better offenses. Blaylock will be all right. He stands as good a chance as most to put up some good points this week.

by **hammerwx** » Sun Nov 14, 2004 12:10 pm

mad benjamin wrote:Yeah, Blaylock may not go off. There's no guarantee's w/ anyone, but I think you can out-think yourself by reading too much into some matchups. The Saints are one of the weaker defenses and KC is one of the better offenses. Blaylock will be all right. He stands as good a chance as most to put up some good points this week.

agree. don't try to overanalyze the situation. KC has one of the most explosive O's in football, and NO D is very suspect.

I think the rotation comment was a smokescreen. Go with history. Blaylock has carried the load exclusively when Holmes has been out.

DaChiefs · by **DaChiefs** » Sun Nov 14, 2004 12:42 pm

bold prediction

by **hammerwx** » Sun Nov 14, 2004 6:22 pm

DaChiefs wrote:bold prediction

Thank you

9 times out of 10 go with history. When has KC ever gone with a rotation, even when Priest was out?

Fantasy Football Cafe Forum

Blaylock to go off. . . . maybe not

Blaylock to go off. . . . maybe not

Who is online