Some of these make me laugh.
Canadian_Cheesehead wrote:My problem was depth, there were no RBs on the waiver wire
No disrespect intended CC - but in a competitive 12 team league did you expect to find good RBs on the ww?
i'm not sure you guys really count as baseballers if you've got quad digit posts over here!
I think that I had 35 posts over here when I started this thing
All of the baseball team had more posts on the baseball side when this started.
VHawk15 wrote:Wait, how did you guys already win? Isn't it who wins the league?
Ok, you got me. The league isn't over yet and we haven't crowned an individual champion yet - I'm just pointing out that with one week still to go, the baseball side has won more games than the football side and the football side can't catch up. Cafe vs. cafe, the Baseball side won
Free Bagel wrote:I think a major problem the football side had is that we didn't adjust enough to the QB-heavy scoring. RB's and WR's get scores you would see in any league, but Manning has put up over 50pts with this league's scoring on several occasions.
Kudos to Lofunzo for smoking us all in that category.
As Cornbread pointed out, its not really a QB-heavy scoring system. It's pretty standard, maybe a little more QB scoring. A lot of QBs could be scoring as much as Manning. C-Pep, Hass, Favre, McNair, McNabb etc, all had the potential to put up numbers just as large as Manning in this scoring system. We only start one QB and there were so many that had the potential to put up these numbers that it did not change the draft strategy at all.
The one person that was really riding Lo hard was KG - where is he?
And before Lofunzo gets a swelled head I would like to point out that in our NL only roto league last year, Lofunzo finished dead last