Let me grab my crystal ball, I forsee in the year 2006, The Detroit Lions vs. the Houston Texans in the Super Bowl.
It could happen! Carr and Harrington will always be compared, just like Rogers and Johnson. But these four guys comparisons will go on much longer than the Manning vs. Leaf did. It's a win-win situation. I have news for the NFL, the Texans will be a playoff team by 2004-2005 season. They know what they are doing and are not making many mistakes. The are following the 1989 Cowboys blueprint. 1st draft a franchise QB, then draft a franchise WR the next year, then a franchise RB the 3rd. Hell, they are ahead of the schedule by taking Tony Hollings in the supplemental draft. He would of went 1st round if not for his injury and might of pulled off a McGahee if he knew he would not be let back in to Georgia Tech. Anyway, go with the one you prefer or like best. Both have great talent.
Here's the lowdown: Rogers 6'3" 205lbs 4.3. makes great catches and has great hands, tall and fast. He does not run the best routes and is a little undecipline at times.
Andre Johnson - 6'2" 230lbs and runs a 4.3 Andre is stronger and looks like a Owens-Boston type of build. He runs very polished routes and is a good down field blocker. His downfall are his hands. He is not as natural of a catcher as Rogers. He even dropped a TD pass against Denver last Saturday night. But he is working hard and will improve in that area.
Both are great. I think both will be in the Pro Bowl soon. I think Rogers might get a lot of double coverage b/c only Hakim and Schroader are out there with him, but Andre better in the long run b/c Bradford and Gaffeny will take a little of the pressure off and Carr is very accurate. Good Luck.