just to echo the thoughts, you only want to veto a trade if it violates the 'competitive spirit of the league', meaning that some form of collusion or a gross injustice is occuring.
now, personally, a case could be made that the guy getting taylor (if healthy) and gardner (a third year guy) over green (and up and comer) and johnson (rookie) is getting a better deal that many would not make.
of course, i have seen on this forum people ask if before last season, someone traded marshall faulk for clinton portis, peerless price and lavernous coles would the trade have been judged 'unfair'....maybe.
homer jay simpson
springfield football atoms