First of all, Travis Henry had a much worse turn out than Barlow, so all you Barlow owners...STOP COMPLAINING!
Well, some could argue that Barlow had higher expectations than Henry. Barlow didn't have anyone to compete with at RB (come on, Maurice Hicks???). On the other hand, Henry is being backed up by a younger, stronger backup RB. If Henry had the starting job for an entire year, he would have posted better numbers than Barlow IMO.
having had both Henry and Barlow, I think I am fairly unbiased to help decide this. Henry may have been the bigger bust, but when he went down, he went down fast. No one played Henry after the first few weeks- injury and losing his job made him an easy no-start. On the other hand, Barlow kept hanging around, and people kept hoping he would put up decent numbers, especially against bad teams. So while Henry may have been a bigger bust, Barlow was more damaging to more fantasy teams, making this the "Barlow Award", not the "Henry Award"
Best... fantasy advice... EVER. :D
[quote]Always play the players who will get you the most points[/quote]