TTTBone wrote:Refs 7, Patriots 0 I'm just getting it in early, so "nobody" else can take credit for such a bold prediction.
Why is it always 7? Have you noticed this? Refs 7, Vikings 0. Refs 7, Falcons 0. Why not Refs 3, whatever team 0, or how come the refs only account for 7 points, why not Refs 14 or Refs 10? Apparently the refs are always involved in the scoring of TDs but never field goals, or safeties.
TTTBone wrote:Refs 7, Patriots 0 I'm just getting it in early, so "nobody" else can take credit for such a bold prediction.
Why is it always 7? Have you noticed this? Refs 7, Vikings 0. Refs 7, Falcons 0. Why not Refs 3, whatever team 0, or how come the refs only account for 7 points, why not Refs 14 or Refs 10? Apparently the refs are always involved in the scoring of TDs but never field goals, or safeties.
TTTBone wrote:Refs 7, Patriots 0 I'm just getting it in early, so "nobody" else can take credit for such a bold prediction.
Why is it always 7? Have you noticed this? Refs 7, Vikings 0. Refs 7, Falcons 0. Why not Refs 3, whatever team 0, or how come the refs only account for 7 points, why not Refs 14 or Refs 10? Apparently the refs are always involved in the scoring of TDs but never field goals, or safeties.
do you not see the obvious answer to this question? the two times it has happened the person posting it believes the refs were responsible for the first td. Its not just some random guess. The Philly game, for instance, the person believed that there was a 3rd down call in favour of the Eagles that was questionable and it led to a TD. I cant remember the exact situation for the Minnesota game, but again the person believed that the refs blew a call in favour of the eagles, which resulted in them scoring a touchdown. Try to refrain from bashing people when really it is you that is confused
Mitchell: "To me, the Patriots are not that good. ... We're the better team... A good team crushes that Patriot team. I'm telling you, they're not that good.'
Transmogrifier wrote:I'm in for the Pats. I'd take the spread too.
So if the Pats don't cover you'll wear a bag? It'd be funny to see a bag for a SB champ.
I'd is a contraction for "I would", meaning if that were the parameters, I would even give six points. I'd probably give twice that, too.
Note, though, that I didn't say "I will," or "I'll."
Brady: a "very mediocre QB" - no1cowboysfan
Mitchell: "To me, the Patriots are not that good. ... We're the better team... A good team crushes that Patriot team. I'm telling you, they're not that good.'
You Pats supporters think its going to be a blowout. Guess what? Everyone thought it was going to be a blowout last year, and it wasn't. I'll say this Eagles team, even without a healthy TO, is better than the Panthers last year. I still think that Patriots will win, but my heart wants the Eagles to win. I'm not going to go bag because I have no emotional ties to the Patriots other than hate, but I'll put my prediction
Pats 27, Eagles 24.
Cafe Home
Fantasy Baseball
Fantasy Basketball
Fantasy Hockey
by maddog60 » Mon Jan 31, 2005 9:53 pm 
