Hasselbeck and krob

[T-BONE]

I drafted Hasselbeck and k robinson. Despite the bye week, having a qb and a wr in the same team is a problem?? Should I trade one of them? Which one?

[EatMyShorts092]

i think its fine, but if u want to trade them go for krob since hell have more value. every time krob gets a td though ull get double pts. just remember that before u trade him. im having the same predicament of possibly ending up with james and harrison but i just figure if theyre the 2 best on the board theres no reason to trade them.

[SinCity]

If you have a ave WR and QB to fill in for that week, don't worry about it. Keep em.

[T-BONE]

OK. The problem is that my second wr is toomer. Toomer and krob have the same bye week. I didnt pay attention !!!!

So I will have to trade one of them.

[Lushcrush]

Don't trade Toomer! He is a receiving machine. Instead, trade a bench player for or pick up an available player with an appropriate bye week. Good luck.

[LBJackal]

Kinda sounds like the situation I'm in...my top 3 WR's are Amani Toomer, Koren Robinson, and Darrell Jackson. I'm in trouble for week 4...hopefully Vick will still be out then though, cuz he's the franchise player for the team I face week four...

[kcman11]

Judging by your avatar, jackal, you shouldn't want Vick to be out in Week 4. I guess that's where they say that fantasy is more important than reality (that's why I try and avoid being a homer when draft day hits -- I used to ALWAYS draft Emmitt Smith and two years ago it hurt me). Oh, and to answer your question T-BONE, you shouldn't feel the need to trade either Hasselbeck or Robinson, that is of course, unless you get a trade offer that's too good to refuse.

[dgroundhog_ffc]

I'd try to trade Toomer. I'm not at all against having the WR/QB combo going. In fact, I kind of prefer it in a good situation. Seattle's offense was pretty impressive the 2nd half of last year. If that returns, you get a high scoring hook-up for a decent value.

I'm not completely sold that the Seattle offense is going to be as impressive as last year, but I own both players in a league or two. They have a big upside. It's a bit of a gamble, but one I was willing to make when the time was right to draft them.

Don't feel forced to trade one away cheap. If you have a back-up TE and K, keep the WR's and drop the reserves. Filling 2 WR spots for a week isn't an automatic loss. WR is almost always a week to week gamble. If you can get past the bye week without dropping a player of value don't feel forced to make a move.

[Xtreme]

Keep them both. They're too good to dump. Try to battle through that week.

[Steel Curtain]

Keep them both. I like being in that situation. I'd rather have 3 stud players out in the same week and just know that I more than likely won't win that week, then be weakened by having one stud player out for 3 different weeks. I was successful with it last year when both my starting rb's had the same bye week and I still got lucky and won after I got better than usual production from my backup rb's and the team I played scored a season low total.