Fantasy Football Cafe Forum

by **Atog** » Fri Apr 01, 2005 3:59 pm

PackerAttack84 wrote:Urlacher: 84

What about Marshall Faulk?

I don't know what he was at in '05, but i think he gets about 90 because of his awareness (and other stats that you get from being the Jerry Rice of RBs)

Was Urlacher not in the 90's for '05?

How Bout...
Charlie Rogers?

by **joshyboy72** » Fri Apr 01, 2005 4:18 pm

I'll say 82 for Charles Rogers. This may be a little low, I'm not sure what he was in Madden 2005 but I'm sure his low injury number or whatever will lower the overall down a bit.

Mike McKenzie?

by **MCG321** » Fri Apr 01, 2005 5:00 pm

joshyboy72 wrote:I'll say 82 for Charles Rogers. This may be a little low, I'm not sure what he was in Madden 2005 but I'm sure his low injury number or whatever will lower the overall down a bit.

Mike McKenzie?

Just a note, injury doesn't affect the overall rating - which is why it's really annoying to draft a great player, only to realize his injury rating is 40. :-t

by **mtryanks12** » Fri Apr 01, 2005 5:46 pm

Faulk: 79 (Just like good old Emmitt Smith)

Julian Peterson??

by **Free Bagel** » Fri Apr 01, 2005 7:09 pm

Well, since this one got skipped:

joshyboy72 wrote:I'll say 82 for Charles Rogers. This may be a little low, I'm not sure what he was in Madden 2005 but I'm sure his low injury number or whatever will lower the overall down a bit.

Mike McKenzie?

Pretty good guess, Rogers was I believe 82ovr in 2004 and 84ovr in 2005, so you're right around the mark there.

Mckenzie 87ovr

just keep the next one as Peterson.

PS to the person asking about Urlacher. I believe he started the season at 97ovr and after roster updates he was around 94ovr.