Azrael wrote:I'm not so much down on Driver; but more that I never really thought alot of him. When he did well 3 years ago he came out of nowhere and surprised alot of people. 2 years ago when he was the No. 1 he didn't do anything. Last year he was just so up and down and I believe he capped out. By that I mean Green Bay's offense won't be as good next year so Driver won't do as good.
Just because their line isn't as good as last year doesn't mean they will pass more. I don't know why people think this. Do they think, "well since the line isn't as good, then they won't be able to run as much and so they'll have to pass more"? The NY Giants are a perfect example. Their line stunk and Barber did way better than the receivers did. And the Steelers 2 years ago are an example of why this isn't correct thinking. Maddox was the chique pick to be a good fantasy passer simpley because the Steelers weren't as good running the ball. End result: Steelers finished like 30th in rushing, Maddox stunk, and Burress stunk. A good running game compliments the pass, it will enable teams to pass more effectively. When a running game isn't as good, the passing game isn't as good.
yeah, but Tiki did much better than the QB and the WR's because they stunk too. Even if Tiki only managed 1200 total yards, he probably would have still been better than Eli and Amani.