ODotW: Part 8, RESULTS

[MeShawn]

But what if he was on Cleveland, Buffalo, Seattle, Dallas, or another team with bad receiving threats?? He'd probably be more invloved in the offense, I guess.

How would that make any difference? Atlanta's recievers are nothing to write home about.

Deluxe was saying that if he played with a better QB, he'd have better stats. Cleveland, Buffalo, and Dallas all have awful QB's.

And Seattle has above average receiving threats. D-Jax (top 12 WR), Koren, and one of the better receiving RB's in the game. Plus, they have an above average QB.

I don't see the point you're trying to make.

[Atog]

It's interesting seeing Shockey fall so much, but i agree with his ranking. Eli seems to forget from time to time that he has a Tight end.

[mtryanks12]

But what if he was on Cleveland, Buffalo, Seattle, Dallas, or another team with bad receiving threats?? He'd probably be more invloved in the offense, I guess.

How would that make any difference? Atlanta's recievers are nothing to write home about.

Deluxe was saying that if he played with a better QB, he'd have better stats. Cleveland, Buffalo, and Dallas all have awful QB's.

And Seattle has above average receiving threats. D-Jax (top 12 WR), Koren, and one of the better receiving RB's in the game. Plus, they have an above average QB.

I don't see the point you're trying to make.

I persoanlly think that Seattle has a very talented offense, but it's not functioning properly. They're doing the right thing by giving the ball to SA 20-30 times each game, but I don't think the passing offense is set up very well. I personally think thair passing game would succeed if it was west-coast based. Thir receivers have some good speed, but so-so hands, so I think they would excel like that.

[LT Blue Colt]

I also don't get why Heap is the undisputed third. Terrible QB, a hot new WR, and coming off an injury. I like Crumpler and Witten just as much because they're number one targets, and had great seasons.

I gotta agree with the Canadian Cowboy on this one. The factors all add up.

[Santacruzer]

Well seeing that you don't get points for how many times you are 'targetted', I don't really buy into that argument too much.

No you don't get points for Targets, but you called Crumpler the No 1 target. I was simply saying that was inaccurate.

Those could have been passes that Price was just the closest WR and Vick got rid of the ball. Also, either the passes were poor or bombs, or that Price couldn't come up with the grab...Where as Crumpler did more often.

That's what I said. Price caught only 42.45% of the time, while Crumpler caught 64.86%. It's hard to say if it's Ron Mexico's fault, or Price's fault, but I believe that Price's Catch percentage is the worst among starting WRs.

So, Crumpler is Vicks most dependable guy.

[SwiperNoSwiping]

Cool, good call. I should have phrased differently

[cruiz03]

Shockey went in last year in the top 3 and now he is 6th. You would think that with a rook QB he would get more looks, but i suppose that's not the case.