Keyser_WV wrote:suggs was just named the starter yesterday. bennett is in a RBBC as far as im concerned. you are making it sound like these guys were feature backs when the rankings were made
Man Deluxe, you sound a little fired up there.
Maybe I am Nostradamus but I pretty much knew Suggs would be the man in CLE. He can be a top back IMO. Definately injury risk though.
I love the rankings. They are the best I have seen yet. I have bookmarked them for use later.
BUT
Even if Suggs and Bennett are both in a RBBC they will score more points than LJ.
Even if you already have your #1 and #2 RB in place I just don't see the value in LJ over Bennett or Suggs even if they are in RBBC.
Keeper league maybe, redraft no way,
Just my opinion
Bennett - injury risk.... One injury and he's done.... He's proved it the past couple years....
Suggs - injury risk..... Misses time frequently.....
Johnson - plays behind an injury risk.... One injury and he becomes a top 10 back....
So let's look at upside, here....
Bennett and Suggs, while starters, will likely share carries.... Both of them have goal line backs playing behind them.... Put them down for 80 yards per game.... And 0 TD's in most contests.... That's not a guy that will EVER crack my starting line-up....
Larry Johnson, although not a starter, plays behind a back who IS an injury risk, and IS aging.... If given the start, he carries behind one of the best run-blocking lines in the past decade... He will not crack my starting line-up, either, unless Holmes gets injured, in which case he very likely becomes my #1 or #2 back.... That's upside....
Why would I draft a guy who has almost no prayer of ever cracking my starting line-up as a starter over a guy who could very well end up being the best back on my team if the injury-prone back ahead of him gets injured, again?