I still think Branch is the best of the 3 WR's. After seeing how he came on after returning from his injury and his playoff performances, I really believe He's more likely to have the breakout year than Terrell.
Life is too short for "Light" Beer and "Diet" Cola
by creamdoorthirtyniner » Sun Jun 12, 2005 12:03 pm
Very good comparison Deluxe. I agree, it's a major crapshoot. And the thing that kills me is that even the "top" receiver never gets "top receiver" numbers
"I like rusty spooons...I like to touch them"
-Salad Fingers
Help Find a Cure for Diabetes,With a Simple Donantion to[url]http://www.jdrf.org/[/url]
You can make a difference!!
MadScott wrote:Yeah, trouble is Terrell's fine in a practice uni but his concentration just isn't there come game time. Branch 1, Givens 1A......everyone else.
I agree. Terrell seems to like to drop balls when the game is on the line. I'll believe it when I see it.
it has nothing to do with terrell dropping balls. it has everything to do with terrell never putting himself into position to catch a ball.
Nothing to do with dropping balls? What games have you been watching? His dropping balls is his biggest flaw.
If someone wants to take Terrell over Branch over Givens, I'll bet I could let them take Boston and Darrell Jackson before I grab Steve Smith and Michael Clayton.
Terrell will be lucky to finish as the #3 WR in NE.
I've been one of the guys that has been saying that Terrell could have a good year. I however am not about to grab him ahead of Branch or Givens. All it does in my mind is lower the value of those other 2 guys, and keep an eye on how Terrell performs in the first couple of games. At the very maximum, I feel that if you have a deeper draft, Terrell might be worth grabbing later on. I do think that by the time it is all said and done, Terrell could have a better stat line than those other two. The potential is there.
his concentration and dropped balls are where the pats come in, s much as i hate em, that organization changes players, makes em want to win more, and being with brady he will be much more comfortable and focused, i think he is better than givens but not branch.
Santacruzer wrote:I've been one of the guys that has been saying that Terrell could have a good year. I however am not about to grab him ahead of Branch or Givens. All it does in my mind is lower the value of those other 2 guys, and keep an eye on how Terrell performs in the first couple of games. At the very maximum, I feel that if you have a deeper draft, Terrell might be worth grabbing later on. I do think that by the time it is all said and done, Terrell could have a better stat line than those other two. The potential is there.
Isn't that the point of late round flyers? It's pretty difficult to find a consistent contributor so deep in a draft and with the potential, as you have noted, for Terrell to post adequete fantasy numbers, he makes a nice last-round pick.
MadScott wrote:Yeah, trouble is Terrell's fine in a practice uni but his concentration just isn't there come game time. Branch 1, Givens 1A......everyone else.
I agree. Terrell seems to like to drop balls when the game is on the line. I'll believe it when I see it.
it has nothing to do with terrell dropping balls. it has everything to do with terrell never putting himself into position to catch a ball.
Nothing to do with dropping balls? What games have you been watching? His dropping balls is his biggest flaw.
Well the fact that he runs bad routes a lot or wrong ones, and that he gets personal fouls called him all the time are pretty big flaws also.
maddog60 wrote:If someone wants to take Terrell over Branch over Givens, I'll bet I could let them take Boston and Darrell Jackson before I grab Steve Smith and Michael Clayton.
Terrell will be lucky to finish as the #3 WR in NE.
I think I might actually want D-jack before Steve Smith, but in terms of the pats wrs, i will avoid them completely.
A new forum opened up! Read about the latest "Great Debate" where YOU ask the questions. You lucky VIP, you.
http://www.fantasyfootballcafe.com/forums/viewforum.php?f=106