I thought an article in this year's Fantasy Football Weekly that compares teams in terms of schedules in weeks 1-4 and 14-17 was interesting. They rank teams in groups of five as far as those against the easiest schedules (running, passing, overall points) and hardest schedules. Here are the results -- Would love your comments...
I don't believe in that strength of schedule stuff. There are so many teams that change from one year to the next in terms of being good defenses. I mean who thought the Skins and Bills would be top 5 at the beginning of last season?
ROYALWITCHEESE wrote:I don't believe in that strength of schedule stuff. There are so many teams that change from one year to the next in terms of being good defenses. I mean who thought the Skins and Bills would be top 5 at the beginning of last season?
Its not an exact science, and you cannot rely on last yrs final rankings, but ignoring schedule and who they play is a mistake.
ROYALWITCHEESE wrote:I don't believe in that strength of schedule stuff. There are so many teams that change from one year to the next in terms of being good defenses. I mean who thought the Skins and Bills would be top 5 at the beginning of last season?
Its not an exact science, and you cannot rely on last yrs final rankings, but ignoring schedule and who they play is a mistake.
Many people avoided Rudi Johnson simply due to his schedule last year. He ended the year as a top10 RB... Schedule should weigh as a factor in making draft choices, but a relatively small one IMO. Situation and talent are much more important..
I think that when you are dealing with studs (picks in the first few rounds) schedule makes absolutely no difference. If that was the case, J Jones wouldn't be drafted until the 5th round because he has to face the Eagles and Skins twice.
I think it only applies to your late selections--those more likely to score in games against bad teams. But a good player like a Moss or Holmes is going to go off every game no matter what.