2005's Tiki Barber??? - Fantasy Football Cafe 2014 Fantasy Football Cafe


Return to Football Talk

2005's Tiki Barber???

Moderator: Football Moderators

2005's Tiki Barber???

Postby Warpigs » Mon Jul 11, 2005 4:27 am

While I don't expect a player to come out of the woodwork every year like Tiki did last season -- but I think that there's a player who has that type of potential that I have heard very little about throughout the cafe.

Ladies and gentlemen -- let me introduce you again to Mr. Michael Bennett. I know that with that name comes an immediate aftertaste of injury potential, but let's look at all sides of this before we start casting stones.

Heading into last season, many fantasy owners were drooling over Bennett. While Onterrio Smith was there to vulture some carries, Bennett was at the time the undisputed top option in Minnesota. However, his season came crashing down due to injury.

This year, Bennett can be had in most drafts in the middle rounds -- and could be the key component for people looking for a second running back after bucking earlier draft round trends by taking a Randy Moss, Peyton Manning or other non-RB early. My point here is that Bennett's value is so low, it's pretty much a tried and true fact that anyone can have him as a second RB -- depending on when you're willing to jump at him.

We all know that Bennett isn't the largest RB in the league. He heads into training camp at 5-foot-9 and 209 pounds. (Interestingly, Tiki Barber is currently 5-foot-10 and 200 pounds.) Also, anyone that knows anything about Michael Bennett knows that he's one of the quickest players in the league right now.

Another factor to consider is Onterrio Smith's suspension. This means that the road is totally open for Bennett to take the reins. Yes, Mewelde Moore will get his share of carries (and could be pretty valuable himself if Bennett does go down) -- and Moe Williams may sniper a few goalline carries -- but Bennett is the best suited to catch balls out of the backfield -- something that Culpepper will be doing more with Moss out of town.

Minnesota's schedule is also a major factor in my views on Bennett this season. The squad plays Tampa Bay, Cincinnati, New Orleans, Atlanta, bye, Chicago, Green Bay, Carolina, Detroit, NY Giants, Green Bay, Cleveland, Detroit, St. Louis, Pittsburgh, Baltimore and Chicago. Yes, there are a few challenges on there, but overall it's not that challenging of a schedule.

Yet another factor to consider is Minnesota's progress on defense. For once, the Vikings may not need to air out the ball every game in a shootout to keep up. The Viking defense should do well against conference foes and other teams faced. This will allow the team to keep the ball on the ground more than ever -- which translates into better stats for Bennett.

The final key to Bennett's success is that he's entering a contract season. It's been proven over and over that players in contract seasons perform well above their normal rate.

Yes, Bennett may be considered an injury threat -- but he also could just as well play for most of the season. Even Fragile Freddy (Taylor) had a fully healthy season not too long ago. I think that as long as Bennett stays healthy (which miraculously could happen for someone looking to improve his contract), he will be a VERY solid second RB and a great value where he's going in most drafts.
Image
Warpigs
General Manager
General Manager

User avatar
Cafe RankerCafe Spotter
Posts: 3054
(Past Year: 3)
Joined: 20 Jun 2003
Home Cafe: Football

Postby Daddymike59 » Mon Jul 11, 2005 8:10 am

I was under the same assumption last year pigs. Fool me once........It's the coach that worries me not Bennett.
Image


Props to Leber for the nice artwork!
Daddymike59
General Manager
General Manager

User avatar
Fantasy ExpertMock(ing) Drafter
Posts: 2915
Joined: 6 Sep 2003
Home Cafe: Football
Location: GOM=30 Home of the Buckeyes

Postby LionsTim » Mon Jul 11, 2005 8:30 am

I could hop on the Bennett train. He seems to produce when healthy and will undoubtedly be a good value. Another guy I like is TJ Duckett. He already is posting good TD numbers, so you will get some production out of him, but with Dunn turning 30 (a superstition I have about RB's, 30 is a bad year to turn, see Stephen Davis and Marshall Faulk) he could see an increased workload. It isn't far-fetched to see Dunn going down, either....
Get your gym shoes on!
LionsTim
Special Teams Staff
Special Teams Staff


Posts: 143
Joined: 11 Jul 2005
Home Cafe: Football
Location: Lansing

Postby tanner » Mon Jul 11, 2005 8:39 am

the case could be made that Bennett could be a dominant player in '05..
he's similar to Robert Smith in that he's fast and very injury prone..but even Smith pulled it together for one great year. Like Bennet, coincidentally, his contract was due up at the end of the year..he led the league in rushing I believe( 2000)..then promptly retired despite having a huge contract offer awaiting..Bennett's contract is due up at the end of the year, so he'll be looking to put together a Por Bowl effort..the Vikings possess one of the league's best offensive lines..Jim Kleinsasser is back..they lack the big play ability at the WR spot and even Mike Tice has acknowledged that his team would like to turn its focus to the running game..
they have to turn to the running game. Duante Culpepper has lost the best weapon in the game, Randy Moss, and the new offensive coordinator wants to run much more than in previous years...

Bennett carries alot of risk, but so does Priest Holmes ( 32 in Oct., 2 major injuries have ended EACH of the past two seasons for him), Shaun Alexander ( will he or won't he sign with Seattle?), Edgerrin James ( is slower than he used to be, and only scored 9 times in the NFL's best-ever offense in 2004), Tatum Bell ( been hurt each of the past 4 seasons, dating back to Oklahoma State days)..

A major hurdle for Bennett is that Moe Williams will hawk most goal line carries, and Mewelde Moore will be a 3rd down back..and, Ciatrick Fason lies in wait on the sidelines..

I'd figure Bennett for about 1,400 yards..6-8 rushing tds...there are too many RB mouths to feed in Minnesota to think he'll get more than 275 carries...
tanner
Special Teams Staff
Special Teams Staff


Posts: 244
Joined: 17 Aug 2004
Home Cafe: Football
Location: nj

Postby creamdoorthirtyniner » Mon Jul 11, 2005 9:04 am

Excellent arguement Tanner. ;-D

I'm not high on Bennett, but I'll take him as my second or third back if he's the best option left and I have a need to fill at RB. Otherwise though, I don't have much faith invested in him :-t
"I like rusty spooons...I like to touch them"
-Salad Fingers

Image

Help Find a Cure for Diabetes,With a Simple Donantion to[url]http://www.jdrf.org/[/url]
You can make a difference!!
creamdoorthirtyniner
General Manager
General Manager

User avatar

Posts: 2348
Joined: 28 Jun 2004
Home Cafe: Football
Location: Going for Two...

Postby skinsfan » Mon Jul 11, 2005 9:12 am

I think that Barber was never really in the woodwork, but I would go with Suggs in cleveland, or possibly Jordan in Oaktown. But who is starting in Cleveland? It cant be Droughns.
Skins fan through thick and thin.
skinsfan
General Manager
General Manager

User avatar

Posts: 2228
Joined: 6 Aug 2003
Home Cafe: Football
Location: DC

Postby tanner » Mon Jul 11, 2005 9:49 am

creamdoorthirtyniner wrote:Excellent arguement Tanner. ;-D

I'm not high on Bennett, but I'll take him as my second or third back if he's the best option left and I have a need to fill at RB. Otherwise though, I don't have much faith invested in him :-t


I agree! very risky pick, for sure! but even if he gets just 250 carries, he'll still nail down 1,250 yards rushing..his avg, when healthy, is 5 yards per carry..he's said to be in terrific shape, and fast as lightning right now..but he's always been fast as lightning! lol...

but the fact that his contract is up at the end of the year means he could very well be worth the risk, as he tries to perform well to rake in a huge long-term deal for 2006 and beyond, either in Minnesota or elsewhere..

but I'm not taking him ahead of Portis, KJ, JJ, Jamal, Lt2, Dillon,Rudi, etc..you're right, he's a great #2 or #3 RB..not a top tier guy..
tanner
Special Teams Staff
Special Teams Staff


Posts: 244
Joined: 17 Aug 2004
Home Cafe: Football
Location: nj

Postby Flux » Mon Jul 11, 2005 10:11 am

-- Vikings Eyeing RBs --
Sun Jul 10, 2005 --from FFMastermind.com

The Pioneer Press reports with RB Onterrio Smith suspended for the year, the Vikings haven't given up on acquiring another running back.
Image
Flux
Mod in Retirement
Mod in Retirement

User avatar
CafeholicFantasy ExpertCafe RankerMock(ing) DrafterEagle EyePick 3 Weekly WinnerMatchup Meltdown SurvivorCafe Blackjack Weekly WinnerLucky Ladders Weekly Winner
Posts: 6113
Joined: 7 Jul 2003
Home Cafe: Football

Re: 2005's Tiki Barber???

Postby Cornbread Maxwell » Mon Jul 11, 2005 10:26 am

Warpigs wrote:Minnesota's schedule is also a major factor in my views on Bennett this season. The squad plays Tampa Bay, Cincinnati, New Orleans, Atlanta, bye, Chicago, Green Bay, Carolina, Detroit, NY Giants, Green Bay, Cleveland, Detroit, St. Louis, Pittsburgh, Baltimore and Chicago. Yes, there are a few challenges on there, but overall it's not that challenging of a schedule.


I dont think MIN has a very favorable schedule at all - in fact I see it as being quite harsh. The only favorable matchups I see are against GB, CLE, and STL. I think the strength of schedule is a pretty large negative when looking at MIN player - that goes for most players in the NFC North. MIN, CHI, and DET all got substatially better on DEF this offseason - either through players returning from injury or new additions - plus they face the AFC North as well - one of the toughest defensive divisions in the NFL(BAL, PIT, CIN, CLE).

Warpigs wrote:Yet another factor to consider is Minnesota's progress on defense. For once, the Vikings may not need to air out the ball every game in a shootout to keep up. The Viking defense should do well against conference foes and other teams faced. This will allow the team to keep the ball on the ground more than ever -- which translates into better stats for Bennett.


I agree they will run the ball more - but due to the loss of Moss, I also see substantially less room to run for MIN. More touches with a lower YPC = ? we'll see. Just be careful suggesting because they should run more means they will get more total rushing yds - that isnt necessarily true.

Warpigs wrote:The final key to Bennett's success is that he's entering a contract season. It's been proven over and over that players in contract seasons perform well above their normal rate.


Now this I cannot agree with even a little bit. Contract yr theory is a myth. For every player you can point to having a great contract yr, there are as many if not more that do not. I have read a number of articles debunking this myth.

I like Bennett as a #4 RB right now - with limited upside. The fact that he will have his TDs hawked is probably my biggest knock against him. Any RB that loses goalline carries loses a ton of value in my opinion. Add in his injury history, and what you get is a #4 RB option.
Cornbread Maxwell
Hall of Fame Hero
Hall of Fame Hero

User avatar
Fantasy ExpertSweet 16 Survivor
Posts: 5924
Joined: 7 Jul 2003
Home Cafe: Football

Postby gatorman1122 » Mon Jul 11, 2005 10:27 am

Quote:
-- Vikings Eyeing RBs --
Sun Jul 10, 2005 --from FFMastermind.com

The Pioneer Press reports with RB Onterrio Smith suspended for the year, the Vikings haven't given up on acquiring another running back.

:-o
gatorman1122
Head Coach
Head Coach

User avatar

Posts: 1466
Joined: 29 Aug 2004
Home Cafe: Football

Next

Return to Football Talk

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests

Forums Articles & Tips Start & Sit Sleepers Rankings Leagues


Get Ready...
The 2014 NFL season kicks off in 20:18 hours
(and 38 days)
2014 NFL Schedule


  • Fantasy Football
  • Article Submissions
  • Privacy Statement
  • Site Survey 
  • Contact