Ludacris Trade Offer?? Opinions Please.......

[joemomma]

I have been offered the following players:

Charlie Garner
Quadry Ismail

He wants:

Curtis Martin
Eric Moulds
Donte Stallworth

Here is my teams depth at those positions:
RB:
Ricky Williams
Michael Pittman
Curtis Martin

WR:
Chris Chambers
Eric Moulds
Donte Stallworth
Deion Branch

Moulds and Chambers are my 1 and 2 receivers. I picked up Martin off of Waivers, some guy dropped him after week 1. He really has not done much yet, but I have hope. We start 2 RB and 2 WR.

The guy offering this thinks that Garner is the best thing since sliced bread. He is weak at WR so that is why he wants Moulds/Stallworth. His team is 0-3.

My team is so far 2-1 and would have been 3-0 if Garcia had not been puking last sunday. I am comfortable with my team but am a little weak at RB.


Your opinoin is appreciated. Thanks!!

[JayM09]

dont do this trade, garner would be nice right now, but in the long run you will be better off not doing this

[kashikis]

dont do the trade youd be giving up way to much depth at WR for what youd be getting. IMO youd regret it later in the season

[Guttpuppy]

3 for 2 or 2 for 1 deals usually benefit the owner recieving the extra player,this is the case here.This may be the time to shop Martin around but don't get rid of Moulds & Stallworth.This trade offer gets a resounding !!!

[terpfan]

NO WAY!

i disagree with gutpuppy. 3 for 2 or 3 for 1 deals are most often better for the person resceiving less players. as a rule, trading quality for quantity isnt a great idea. of course there are exceptions, but in this deal u would be getting less and worse players.