My Opinion (Michael Clayton)

[Kensat30]

Clayton? Burleson? Steve Smith?

Who to choose...

I'll take Darrell Jackson.

Just out of curiosity why DJax over the field here? Hass or the state of the WR position there or???

1) consistency
2) easier division
3) consistency
4) consistency

---

Pass up Clayton and Burleson in the late 4th and you might miss last year's Javon Walker. Then again you might miss last year's Santana Moss, Steve Smith, Koren Robinson, Peerless Price, Chris Chambers, etc.

Darrell Jackson is going to get you a solid 1100/8 every year with upside to go for more. Last year as the only target in Seattle, he became a borderline #1 WR. Darrell Jackson kinda reminds me of Joe Horn(pre-2004), underlooked WR that is consistent as the studs on a year by year basis, but just a notch lower in production. Maybe 2005 he becomes the 1200/10 type WR and justifys a 3rd round pick instead of a 4th rounder. He has the same upside as the younger guys, without the risk of total bust.