Cunningham or Vick?

[Murph3fan]

Which one would you rather have. I would personally take Randall. I have never once seen anybody compare these two, why?

[M_Zimm_ffc]

You might wanna try the football forum.

[maddog60]

Everyone jumped on the Vick bandwagon with the promise that he could potentially throw for 3000 yards and rush for 1000. Well, Vick has reached that potential, but here's some stats on Randal:

+---------------------------------------+-----------------+
| Passing | Rushing |
+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+
| Year TM | G | Comp Att PCT YD Y/A TD INT | Att Yards TD |
+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+
| 1985 phi | 6 | 34 81 42.0 548 6.8 1 8 | 29 205 0 |
| 1986 phi | 15 | 111 209 53.1 1391 6.7 8 7 | 66 540 5 |
| 1987 phi | 12 | 223 406 54.9 2786 6.9 23 12 | 76 505 3 |
| 1988 phi | 16 | 301 560 53.8 3808 6.8 24 16 | 93 624 6 |
| 1989 phi | 16 | 290 532 54.5 3400 6.4 21 15 | 104 621 4 |
| 1990 phi | 16 | 271 465 58.3 3466 7.5 30 13 | 118 942 5 |

About 100 total yards short of 3500/1000 yards with just about a 3:1 TD to INT ratio.

Randall by a mile.

[Dr. Duran Duran]

Cunningham in a landslide. I remember watching him with the Eagles, completely dumbfounded by his passing abilities as well as his running abilities. He's truly one of the most underappreciated old schoolers out there. Vick can't hold Randall's jock.

[Spider Monkey]

Randal

[Guttpuppy]

Cunningham for now, Vick still has a bright future though.