Buckhalter or Hambrick?

[MEK4178]

Right now, i have hambrick, and it looks like dallas might be doing RB by commitee.

Should i drop Hambrick and pick up Buckhalter.

[awwchrist]

I wouldn't.

[Plato]

No, you should keep Hambrick. I believe there is a much better chance that Hambrick will get 15-20 carries or more in each game than there is that Bucky will do the same.

[DraftDodger]

Difference is, Buckhalter will DO something with his carries. I have Buckhalter on many of my teams and Hambrick on none of my teams. If you aren't forced to start either of them (please tell me that you're not), I'd advise Buckhalter over Hambrick. We KNOW that Hambrick won't be spectacular, but it's possible that Buckhalter will be carrying his team before midseason.

[SinCity]

Hambricks a keeper man!

[mcqfesijiba]

I'd go with Hambrick. Hopefully these aren't guys you're looking at as starters. I think Hambrick will be a good bye week RB.

[Ousmagic]

id go with hambrick since he has a better chance of getting a lot of carries

[tjhksig]

Ham-brick looked pretty solid last night. I'd take a starter over a RBBC anyday. You know Parcells will feed him the rock inside the 5.