robinson or boston

[STEELtownUSA]

robinson or boston
i have been offed either one
which is better

[Wolverine]

go with robinson

[Poobah]

Absolutely!! K-Rob is in a better offense, better QB, more time in the same city and offense, and isn't coming off of an injury year.

[Cornbread Maxwell]

Ill cast my vote for Boston

[CTC]

Such a gamble.

You are pretty much assured that K. Robinson will bring you decent WR points. On the other hand, Boston could either light up the League, or light up a crack pipe and get kicked out of the League.

Seriously, Boston has so much potential. He has a linebacker's body but he's playing WR. However, even if he does stays healthy, he won't be playing every down. After a couple plays, he will need to be taken out of the game to rest because with his bulk he's lost endurance. He admitted this himself in a recent interview.

But think if you are Drew Brees inside the 20. Who do you throw to? Tim Dwight? Or do you throw to your other wideout who can bench press a volkswagen and outjump Kobe?

Expect lots of TDs for Boston, but less yards than everyone else is predicting for him.

After saying all that, I'm still not sure who I'd take...

[Questi4110]

I'd take KoRo

[emaja]

Absolutely!! K-Rob is in a better offense, better QB, more time in the same city and offense, and isn't coming off of an injury year.

Exactly. Besides Schottenheimer is in love with the running game, so no matter what LT will be the go-to guy every time he is on the field.

I never like WR's switching teams after an injury.

[Ousmagic]

k rob in a close one

[Azrael]

I'll also add that LT sucks up alot of receptions (79 last year) compared to Alexander (59 last year). So Robinson will have less pass attempts eaten up by his RB.

[VHawk15]

I'd have to say K-Rob. He has a much easier schedule and a better QB. He is also much less injury-prone.