onnestabe wrote:moochman wrote:onnestabe which one of your statements are you suggesting you believe?Atlanta would make less money without Michael Vick, that is certain
The loss of Vick would adversely affect the profitability of ALL NFL teams
So you're suggesting that marquee players have not only value to their team, but also the league itself. That's correct. But why then do you then go on to say;Individual players by themselves don't siginificantly impact the size of the "pie".
You so directly contradict yourself in the length of one post that your post lacks credibility.
I don't see that I am contradicting myself. ONE player does not make or break a team financially, nor does he make or break the NFL.
You are trying to say that I contradict myself. .
Just read what you wrote. I'm not trying to say you're contradicting yourself, your words are. They are contradictory statements. You didn't say that a player does not make or break a team, but the "the loss of Vick would adversely affect the profitablility of ALL NFL teams" Then go onto to say "Individual players by themselves don't siginificantly impact the size of the "pie". "
That's is contradictory. You cannot defend one statement without discrediting the other. Doesn't make for a coherent point.