Cowboys 4 life wrote:I think USC deserves to be #1 and I'm a UCLA fan who hates them.
If it comes down to 4 undefeated teams I feel we will see USC and VT play for the Nat title. I think VT has a tougher remaining schedule than both but won't vault themselves to #1.
This is only like the 15th mile of a marathon though. There is bound to be some change before the end.
USC, VT, and Texas are on a different level than GA and Bama IMO. GA had trouble with Ark who USC killed by 50 and put backups in in the 3rd qtr. Now no starting QB forget about it. Bama has really only had 1 impressive victory against FL and a bunch of games where they just beat teams without the exclamation point.
Texas has had 2 real nice wins and has decisively won the games they are heavily favored in but does not have a tough remaining schedule.
VT if they can get through BC and Miami I feel they will vault ahead of Texas and play USC.
Either way we will have an argument on our hands when season ends.
I like the tourney idea. Something like a march madness but on a smaller scale. Thats the only way to accurately determine who is the Nat Champ.
USAToday's Strength of Schedule has Texas at #1, USC at #2 and Virginia Tech at #3.
I don't think VA Tech will go undefeated, but if they do they'd have a better argument for playing Texas than USC. I don't see how you can leave Texas out of the Title game when they've played stronger competition than USC.
Of course, all this does is make the argument once again that there needs to be a playoff.