fellow comishiners, is this trade vetoable

[big shot]

chad johnson and micheal pittman for portis and plaxico, the guy giving plaxico and portis really didnt have running backs to spare.

[lmcjaho]

CJ > Plax
Pittman < Portis

What's the problem?

[vuch]

i mean it sucks for the plax/portis guy but its not vetoable

[logan]

not vetoable in my opinion either.

[Vixtor]

Definitely not.

[Bowie]

I could see that being a great trade under the right circumstances. The team recieving Johnson and Pittman probably has a quality #1 RB and Caddy, so he gets Pittman as a handcuff, and an upgrade at WR (thinking he is selling high on Portis). The other team is probably in trouble with his RBs since Pittman will sit for Caddy, so he trades for Portis (convinced that this weeks game means Portis will turn things around) at the expense of a WR downgrade. Assuming this is close to the truth, this is a very nice trade. Even if I am completely off, I still can't see vetoing this.

[FFCrazy]

I'd let it go.

[Big Game James]

Not vetoable. However, not a smart trade either. I would definitely want to be on the Plaxi/Portis receiving end.

------------------------------------

QB: Carson Palmer
WR: Terrell Owens, D Jax, Nate Burelson, Deion Branch & Joe Jurevicius
RB: Domanick Davis & LaMont Jordan, Antowain Smith & Ricky Williams
TE: Chris Cooley
Flex: Tony Fisher
K: Neil Rackers
D: Tampa Bay & Pittsburgh

[saundman2000]

seems relatively balanced on both sides of trade.

shouldn't be vetoed IMO

[Arlo]

Agreed with the gang. It might not be perfectly even, but I don't see a reason to veto this one.