fellow comishiners, is this trade vetoable - Fantasy Football Cafe 2014 Fantasy Football Cafe


Return to Football Talk

fellow comishiners, is this trade vetoable

Moderator: Football Moderators

Postby phunkadelic » Wed Oct 26, 2005 6:54 am

absolutely not vetoable
phunkadelic
Special Teams Staff
Special Teams Staff

User avatar

Posts: 232
Joined: 8 Apr 2003
Home Cafe: Baseball

Postby edanono » Wed Oct 26, 2005 7:58 am

Looks fine to me. And I have seen some crappy deals this year.
DA Nono
edanono
Special Teams Staff
Special Teams Staff


Posts: 349
Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Home Cafe: Football
Location: Wisconsin

Postby knapplc » Wed Oct 26, 2005 8:31 am

Only veto trades that are obvious collusion, not just because it's lopsided one way or the other. If both parties have paid their money you have no right to run their teams for them, nor do you have an obligation to protect someone from their own stupidity.

I would not veto this trade.
Image
How 'bout them Huskers!
knapplc
Hall of Fame Hero
Hall of Fame Hero

User avatar
Cafe WriterCafe RankerGolden Eagle EyeCafe MusketeerCafe Blackjack Weekly Winner
Posts: 18961
Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Home Cafe: Football
Location: It's an L, not an I

Postby Plindsey88 » Wed Oct 26, 2005 8:54 am

knapplc wrote:Only veto trades that are obvious collusion, not just because it's lopsided one way or the other. If both parties have paid their money you have no right to run their teams for them, nor do you have an obligation to protect someone from their own stupidity.

I would not veto this trade.



I have to agree.

The one and ONLY time a trade is vetoable is in the case of collusion...


If you have an 0-7 teams in your league who trades a 5-2 team Chad Johnson and Edgerrin James for Deion Branch and Lee Suggs, THEN you have a case for collusion, and the trade is vetoable.... But I don't see that being the case in this circumstance....
Image

Signature courtesy of: madaslives911
Plindsey88
Mod in Retirement
Mod in Retirement

User avatar
Fantasy ExpertCafe WriterCafe RankerMock(ing) DrafterEagle EyeCafe MusketeerMatchup Meltdown SurvivorCafe Blackjack Weekly WinnerLucky Ladders Weekly Winner
Posts: 10241
Joined: 19 Sep 2003
Home Cafe: Football
Location: Richmond, VA

Postby jayday » Wed Oct 26, 2005 9:09 am

they are ugly trades....but i don't see collusion....and that is the only reason to veto a trade....
jayday
Hall of Fame Hero
Hall of Fame Hero

User avatar
CafeholicFantasy ExpertCafe RankerGraphics ExpertMock(ing) DrafterEagle EyePick 3 Weekly WinnerCafe Blackjack Weekly WinnerLucky Ladders Weekly Winner
Posts: 5459
(Past Year: 8)
Joined: 14 Aug 2005
Home Cafe: Football

Postby danleroi22 » Wed Oct 26, 2005 9:13 am

I'm with the rest... this should not be vetoed. It's actually decently fair, and for me to veto a trade it has to be pretty obvious that collusion is going on or that someone is getting TOTALLY ripped off.
Questions or Comments? Feel free to PM me.

I know that I've been given more than beyond measure.
danleroi22
General Manager
General Manager

Cafe WriterCafe RankerMock(ing) DrafterEagle EyeCafe MusketeerWeb SupporterSweet 16 SurvivorCafe Blackjack Weekly WinnerLucky Ladders Weekly Winner
Posts: 4846
(Past Year: 2)
Joined: 14 Jun 2004
Home Cafe: Football
Location: SO CLOSE to "da hall" (Cambridge, MA)

Previous

Return to Football Talk

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests

Forums Articles & Tips Start & Sit Sleepers Rankings Leagues


Get Ready...
The 2014 NFL season kicks off in 7:27 hours
(and 36 days)
2014 NFL Schedule


  • Fantasy Football
  • Article Submissions
  • Privacy Statement
  • Site Survey 
  • Contact