fellow comishiners, is this trade vetoable

[phunkadelic]

absolutely not vetoable

[edanono]

Looks fine to me. And I have seen some crappy deals this year.

[knapplc]

Only veto trades that are obvious collusion, not just because it's lopsided one way or the other. If both parties have paid their money you have no right to run their teams for them, nor do you have an obligation to protect someone from their own stupidity.

I would not veto this trade.

[Plindsey88]

Only veto trades that are obvious collusion, not just because it's lopsided one way or the other. If both parties have paid their money you have no right to run their teams for them, nor do you have an obligation to protect someone from their own stupidity.

I would not veto this trade.

I have to agree.

The one and ONLY time a trade is vetoable is in the case of collusion...


If you have an 0-7 teams in your league who trades a 5-2 team Chad Johnson and Edgerrin James for Deion Branch and Lee Suggs, THEN you have a case for collusion, and the trade is vetoable.... But I don't see that being the case in this circumstance....

[jayday]

they are ugly trades....but i don't see collusion....and that is the only reason to veto a trade....

[danleroi22]

I'm with the rest... this should not be vetoed. It's actually decently fair, and for me to veto a trade it has to be pretty obvious that collusion is going on or that someone is getting TOTALLY ripped off.