Cornbread Maxwell wrote:I guess one reason Im against it is that I dont see the need to incorporate flexibility and I disagree with the theory that it increases strategy.
I like having set positions because that IMO is the ultimate in maximizing strategy. You cant fudge a position and make up for it as easily when you must start a RB or WR or TE.
My sentiments exactly, Especially since a lot of "flex" leagues pretty much eliminate the TE spot altogether.
BTW, If Flint is the 2nd Most Dangerous City in America (which I Fully believe having been there several times,) who topped the charts? Just Curious.