FELLOW COMMISH'S!!! Is this trade vetoable? - Fantasy Football Cafe 2014 Fantasy Football Cafe


Return to Football Talk

FELLOW COMMISH'S!!! Is this trade vetoable?

Moderator: Football Moderators

FELLOW COMMISH'S!!! Is this trade vetoable?

Postby danleroi22 » Mon Oct 31, 2005 11:08 am

Team A trades Fred Taylor
Team B trades Larry Johnson and Antonio Gates

I'm not sure guys... do you think this trade needs to be vetoed or is it fair?
Questions or Comments? Feel free to PM me.

I know that I've been given more than beyond measure.
danleroi22
General Manager
General Manager

Cafe WriterCafe RankerMock(ing) DrafterEagle EyeCafe MusketeerWeb SupporterSweet 16 SurvivorCafe Blackjack Weekly WinnerLucky Ladders Weekly Winner
Posts: 4846
(Past Year: 2)
Joined: 14 Jun 2004
Home Cafe: Football
Location: SO CLOSE to "da hall" (Cambridge, MA)

Postby Redskins Win » Mon Oct 31, 2005 11:19 am

just because it looks lopsided to you, doesn't mean veto, prove collusion and then veto. Freddy had a good game and maybe the guy trading him is 1. taking advantage of his value and 2. targeting a guy who really needs a RB.

Honestly I would think that gates for taylor would be fine. but johnson sweetens the deal and makes it a no brainer.

BTW who initiated the deal, A or B?
Image[/quote]
[size=14][b]Letters from the procupine, they'll stick straight through you.
So read one anytime you think you've made mistakes.[/b][/size]
Redskins Win
Hall of Fame Hero
Hall of Fame Hero

User avatar
Mock(ing) DrafterEagle EyeMatchup Meltdown SurvivorCafe Blackjack Weekly WinnerLucky Ladders Weekly Winner
Posts: 8272
Joined: 23 Sep 2003
Home Cafe: Football

Postby Cooner » Mon Oct 31, 2005 11:23 am

not at all vetoable
Cooner
Offensive Coordinator
Offensive Coordinator

User avatar

Posts: 746
Joined: 2 May 2004
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: da Big Apple

Postby BrutallyHuge » Mon Oct 31, 2005 11:23 am

Looks ok.
BrutallyHuge
Hall of Fame Hero
Hall of Fame Hero

User avatar
Cafe RankerEagle EyeCafe Blackjack Weekly WinnerLucky Ladders Weekly Winner
Posts: 5971
Joined: 21 Sep 2003
Home Cafe: Football
Location: Illadelph

Postby jh2031 » Mon Oct 31, 2005 11:26 am

Yeah, it's not that bad. B wins the trade but it's not vetoable.
jh2031
General Manager
General Manager

User avatar
Eagle Eye
Posts: 3595
Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Home Cafe: Football
Location: Pittsburgh, PA....Awaiting our next Super Bowl

Postby mystykoekaki » Mon Oct 31, 2005 11:28 am

Yeah I prolly would veto that.
mystykoekaki Beginner
General Manager
General Manager

User avatar

Posts: 3185
Joined: 13 Dec 2003
Home Cafe: Football

Postby TheRawDAWG » Mon Oct 31, 2005 1:39 pm

Bullshit deal, but unless it's collusion or absolutely horrible (which this isn't) then it's not vetoable.

My thoughts on the trade:

IK wouldn't even trade Gates for Taylor. Taylor is hurting right now. Sure he had a great game yesterday but he had it in alot of pain. Throwing in LJ just makes this guy seem so desperate. LJ is a Priest injury (which may or may not have happened yesterday) away from being a top 5-10 back. Taylor aint even close.
So they weren't the best...and may have ended the worst. SO WHAT!
TheRawDAWG
Head Coach
Head Coach

User avatar

Posts: 1599
Joined: 16 Feb 2004
Home Cafe: Football
Location: Up in Canada

Postby jayday » Mon Oct 31, 2005 1:44 pm

TheRawDAWG wrote:Bullshit deal, but unless it's collusion or absolutely horrible (which this isn't) then it's not vetoable.

My thoughts on the trade:

IK wouldn't even trade Gates for Taylor. Taylor is hurting right now. Sure he had a great game yesterday but he had it in alot of pain. Throwing in LJ just makes this guy seem so desperate. LJ is a Priest injury (which may or may not have happened yesterday) away from being a top 5-10 back. Taylor aint even close.

good post ;-D
jayday
Hall of Fame Hero
Hall of Fame Hero

User avatar
CafeholicFantasy ExpertCafe RankerGraphics ExpertMock(ing) DrafterEagle EyePick 3 Weekly WinnerCafe Blackjack Weekly WinnerLucky Ladders Weekly Winner
Posts: 5459
(Past Year: 8)
Joined: 14 Aug 2005
Home Cafe: Football

Re: FELLOW COMMISH'S!!! Is this trade vetoable?

Postby Arlo » Mon Oct 31, 2005 1:52 pm

danleroi22 wrote:I'm not sure guys... do you think this trade needs to be vetoed or is it fair?

Neither. ;-)
Arlo
Hall of Fame Hero
Hall of Fame Hero

User avatar
Cafe WriterCafe RankerMock(ing) DrafterEagle EyeInnovative MemberCafe MusketeerPick 3 Weekly WinnerSweet 16 SurvivorCafe Blackjack Weekly WinnerLucky Ladders Weekly Winner
Posts: 6631
Joined: 4 Jan 2002
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: The 50 yard line

Postby danleroi22 » Mon Oct 31, 2005 2:19 pm

Thanks guys...

I'm going to let it go thru... it may not be fair... but I agree with the rest of you that there is not really bad enough to veto.

As far as I know there is no collusion involved.

Team B initiated the trade and Team A accepted... looks clean to me, but I'll talk to the Team B owner to make sure.

I was thinking that it couldn't be vetoed... just wanted to see you guys' opinion.

Thanks!
Questions or Comments? Feel free to PM me.

I know that I've been given more than beyond measure.
danleroi22
General Manager
General Manager

Cafe WriterCafe RankerMock(ing) DrafterEagle EyeCafe MusketeerWeb SupporterSweet 16 SurvivorCafe Blackjack Weekly WinnerLucky Ladders Weekly Winner
Posts: 4846
(Past Year: 2)
Joined: 14 Jun 2004
Home Cafe: Football
Location: SO CLOSE to "da hall" (Cambridge, MA)

Next

Return to Football Talk

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests

Forums Articles & Tips Start & Sit Sleepers Rankings Leagues


Get Ready...
The 2014 NFL season kicks off in 15:19 hours
(and 35 days)
2014 NFL Schedule


  • Fantasy Football
  • Article Submissions
  • Privacy Statement
  • Site Survey 
  • Contact