Fantasy Football Cafe Forum

by **danleroi22** » Mon Oct 31, 2005 11:08 am

Team A trades Fred Taylor
Team B trades Larry Johnson and Antonio Gates

I'm not sure guys... do you think this trade needs to be vetoed or is it fair?

by **Redskins Win** » Mon Oct 31, 2005 11:19 am

just because it looks lopsided to you, doesn't mean veto, prove collusion and then veto. Freddy had a good game and maybe the guy trading him is 1. taking advantage of his value and 2. targeting a guy who really needs a RB.

Honestly I would think that gates for taylor would be fine. but johnson sweetens the deal and makes it a no brainer.

BTW who initiated the deal, A or B?

by **Cooner** » Mon Oct 31, 2005 11:23 am

not at all vetoable

by **BrutallyHuge** » Mon Oct 31, 2005 11:23 am

Looks ok.

by **jh2031** » Mon Oct 31, 2005 11:26 am

Yeah, it's not that bad. B wins the trade but it's not vetoable.

mystykoekaki · by **mystykoekaki** » Mon Oct 31, 2005 11:28 am

Yeah I prolly would veto that.

by **TheRawDAWG** » Mon Oct 31, 2005 1:39 pm

Bullshit deal, but unless it's collusion or absolutely horrible (which this isn't) then it's not vetoable.

My thoughts on the trade:

IK wouldn't even trade Gates for Taylor. Taylor is hurting right now. Sure he had a great game yesterday but he had it in alot of pain. Throwing in LJ just makes this guy seem so desperate. LJ is a Priest injury (which may or may not have happened yesterday) away from being a top 5-10 back. Taylor aint even close.

by **jayday** » Mon Oct 31, 2005 1:44 pm

TheRawDAWG wrote:Bullshit deal, but unless it's collusion or absolutely horrible (which this isn't) then it's not vetoable.

My thoughts on the trade:

IK wouldn't even trade Gates for Taylor. Taylor is hurting right now. Sure he had a great game yesterday but he had it in alot of pain. Throwing in LJ just makes this guy seem so desperate. LJ is a Priest injury (which may or may not have happened yesterday) away from being a top 5-10 back. Taylor aint even close.

good post

by **Arlo** » Mon Oct 31, 2005 1:52 pm

danleroi22 wrote:I'm not sure guys... do you think this trade needs to be vetoed or is it fair?

Neither.

by **danleroi22** » Mon Oct 31, 2005 2:19 pm

Thanks guys...

I'm going to let it go thru... it may not be fair... but I agree with the rest of you that there is not really bad enough to veto.

As far as I know there is no collusion involved.

Team B initiated the trade and Team A accepted... looks clean to me, but I'll talk to the Team B owner to make sure.

I was thinking that it couldn't be vetoed... just wanted to see you guys' opinion.

Thanks!

Fantasy Football Cafe Forum

FELLOW COMMISH'S!!! Is this trade vetoable?

FELLOW COMMISH'S!!! Is this trade vetoable?

Re: FELLOW COMMISH'S!!! Is this trade vetoable?

Who is online