Well i know he is out of football and if i remeber correctly i think he is even hosting a reality Tv show. But why would a team like say the packers who need a dominate running back in there line up not pick him up? I know the tred on his tires is very low. The titans ran him 400 times a year for like 4 years in a row or something like that. But when you have lost 3 running backs to injury 2 season ending, and you are on practice squad guys why not?
I know that Sam Gado had a pretty good game for the packers last week. But i think eddie would still be a very valuable asset. If Gado goes on to have a great final 8 games great but if not then why not pick him up?
eddie george was pathetic in dallas do you remember that? he had like a 1.3 ypc average. it was a disgrace. i think he knew he had hung around too long and sullied his good name. there's no way he'd come back.
moonhead
Hall of Fame Hero
Posts: 15994
(Past Year: 15)
Joined: 16 Oct 2004
Yards this season: 0
Home Cafe: Football
Location: questioning your fanhood...funk o'meter: funkalicious
benjapage wrote:i think the word you're searching is "dominant," and eddie george hasn't been a dominant presence in at least three years.
b
Tsk tsk tsk....if you are going to correct someone you should make sure your post is flawless...
This should read, "I think the word you're searching for is "dominant". Besides, he misspelled tread as well! LOL!
Anyway, you are absolutely correct about Eddie, he was worn out. I could see him coming aboard some team in the future as a running back coach or something, but he should never put on a uniform again.[/b]
benjapage wrote:i think the word you're searching is "dominant," and eddie george hasn't been a dominant presence in at least three years.
b
Tsk tsk tsk....if you are going to correct someone you should make sure your post is flawless...
This should read, "I think the word you're searching for is "dominant". Besides, he misspelled tread as well! LOL![/b]
dang, but "searching for" is not grammatically correct, either. upon revisiting, here is the proper deliverance of the intended sentence:
i think the word for which you are searching, is "dominant."
now that we have that resolved, we can turn our attention to quentin griffin. he recently tried out for the chiefs. if he becomes lj's back-up, he would become a viable threat behind that o-line.
benjapage wrote:i think the word you're searching is "dominant," and eddie george hasn't been a dominant presence in at least three years.
b
Tsk tsk tsk....if you are going to correct someone you should make sure your post is flawless...
This should read, "I think the word you're searching for is "dominant". Besides, he misspelled tread as well! LOL![/b]
dang, but "searching for" is not grammatically correct, either. upon revisiting, here is the proper deliverance of the intended sentence:
i think the word for which you are searching, is "dominant."
now that we have that resolved, we can turn our attention to quentin griffin. he recently tried out for the chiefs. if he becomes lj's back-up, he would become a viable threat behind that o-line.
b
Okay, you got me there.
Now you made a bigger mistake.... Thinking Q-Tip could be valuable anywhere outside of the job of running the cash register at McDonald's. If he couldn't run in Denver, KC isn't going to help either.
benjapage wrote:now that we have that resolved, we can turn our attention to quentin griffin. he recently tried out for the chiefs. if he becomes lj's back-up, he would become a viable threat behind that o-line.
b
Okay, you got me there.
Now you made a bigger mistake.... Thinking Q-Tip could be valuable anywhere outside of the job of running the cash register at McDonald's. If he couldn't run in Denver, KC isn't going to help either.
didn't q have a really good stretch with denver? was that stopped by ineffectiveness or injury? can't remember...
Cafe Home
Fantasy Baseball
Fantasy Basketball
Fantasy Hockey
by wurthit » Thu Nov 10, 2005 10:40 am 
