by flotsamnjetsam » Wed Dec 07, 2005 4:56 pm
I still say it wasn't a bad decision to start Warner over Palmer last week. I have Palmer on one of my teams and the only week that I sat him (not including the bye week) was week 7 against Pitt. At the time I had Brunell as by backup, he was on fire, and he was playing the 32nd ranked SF passing D. The move paid off bigtime that week. I sat Palmer for the 2nd time all year last week to start Warner. Palmer didn't do well in week 7 against Pitt. Warner (just like Brunell in week 7) has been on fire, and was playing the 32nd ranked SF passing D. Palmer had the better week and I was lucky in that I didn't lose the game because of this move, but I still stand by the decision. Warner had a better chance to have a big game against SF than Palmer against Pitt. It didn't work out but since when does everything work out in fantasy football? You do all the research, come to the forum for advice, and then you make the best decision possible. Obviously not all the decisions will work out no matter how much sense they make. Did anyone sit LT2 the week he had like 1 point against Philly? No. LT2 is a must start every week but that week he happened to have a bad game. All you can do is make the best educated guess on who will do better each week. After that it's out of our hands and noone knows what will really happen on game day.
Cafe Home
Fantasy Baseball
Fantasy Basketball
Fantasy Hockey
