Thanx, but let me give you the whole thing, I'd love to see your guys' opinions, they're always great.
For almost the entire season, I have played w/o a IDP, week in and out. On a few cases where I was losing or winning, but it was close, I would pick someone up just for the week, just in case.
Strategy: In our league a defensive player averages a fraction of what other positions do, and I felt it more advantageous to hold onto an extra RB, QB, or WR on my roster.
I did that again this week, but the Commish claims that I still have a shot to beat him(it is possible, but unlikely even if I add an IDP).
My seeding will be either 3 or 4, win or lose tonight.
His will be either 3 or 6(8 team playoff).
He still has the option of benching his Seattle Defense and throwing the game, because he would prefer(matchup wise) the 6th seed.
He says since I didn't play a full roster(no IDP), regardless of my strategy, he has the right to drop his Team Defense in order to get his preferred seeding because we are both "playing for the future" in our strategies, which is what I've been doing by not using IDP's.