Is there any reason to believe Willie Parker shouldn't be a decent number two in 12 teamers for next year? I can't think of one, can someone shed some light here?
'Twas a fun year, fellas.
The Great Gambini
General Manager
Posts: 3654
(Past Year: 2)
Joined: 11 Nov 2003
Yards this season: 4
Home Cafe: Football
Location: Title Town - 3 state chamionships in 5 years!
SA didn't have the game of his life either, so is he crap?
With whom will FWP be sharing carries? Haynes? Duce Staley? I don't see where you're coming from too much, Sling.
'Twas a fun year, fellas.
The Great Gambini
General Manager
Posts: 3654
(Past Year: 2)
Joined: 11 Nov 2003
Yards this season: 4
Home Cafe: Football
Location: Title Town - 3 state chamionships in 5 years!
The Great Gambini wrote:SA didn't have the game of his life either, so is he crap? With whom will FWP be sharing carries? Haynes? Duce Staley? I don't see where you're coming from too much, Sling.
If you don't think that they are going to aquire another back then you are crazy. FWP cannot handle a full-load during a season. They will probably get rid of staley...he is worthless. Haynes could take some carries, but I can't see them not getting another back to share the load with FWP.
The Great Gambini wrote:SA didn't have the game of his life either, so is he crap? With whom will FWP be sharing carries? Haynes? Duce Staley? I don't see where you're coming from too much, Sling.
If you don't think that they are going to aquire another back then you are crazy. FWP cannot handle a full-load during a season. They will probably get rid of staley...he is worthless. Haynes could take some carries, but I can't see them not getting another back to share the load with FWP.
Not really sure where this is all coming from. The question posed was whether or not Parker would be a good fantasy no.2 back. Based on this years numbers (sharing carries) the answer would be yes. Why would his numbers go down next year?
The Great Gambini wrote:SA didn't have the game of his life either, so is he crap? With whom will FWP be sharing carries? Haynes? Duce Staley? I don't see where you're coming from too much, Sling.
If you don't think that they are going to aquire another back then you are crazy. FWP cannot handle a full-load during a season.
How do you know? His numbers weren't too bad this year handling a significant load.
'Twas a fun year, fellas.
The Great Gambini
General Manager
Posts: 3654
(Past Year: 2)
Joined: 11 Nov 2003
Yards this season: 4
Home Cafe: Football
Location: Title Town - 3 state chamionships in 5 years!
The Great Gambini wrote:SA didn't have the game of his life either, so is he crap? With whom will FWP be sharing carries? Haynes? Duce Staley? I don't see where you're coming from too much, Sling.
If you don't think that they are going to aquire another back then you are crazy. FWP cannot handle a full-load during a season. They will probably get rid of staley...he is worthless. Haynes could take some carries, but I can't see them not getting another back to share the load with FWP.
Not really sure where this is all coming from. The question posed was whether or not Parker would be a good fantasy no.2 back. Based on this years numbers (sharing carries) the answer would be yes. Why would his numbers go down next year?
I just don't see him being a good number 2 this year. Solid number 3 or backup. Just not an every week starter.
The Great Gambini wrote:SA didn't have the game of his life either, so is he crap? With whom will FWP be sharing carries? Haynes? Duce Staley? I don't see where you're coming from too much, Sling.
If you don't think that they are going to aquire another back then you are crazy. FWP cannot handle a full-load during a season. They will probably get rid of staley...he is worthless. Haynes could take some carries, but I can't see them not getting another back to share the load with FWP.
Not really sure where this is all coming from. The question posed was whether or not Parker would be a good fantasy no.2 back. Based on this years numbers (sharing carries) the answer would be yes. Why would his numbers go down next year?
I just don't see him being a good number 2 this year. Solid number 3 or backup. Just not an every week starter.
Just so I'm clear, Parker wont be a good no.2 fantasy back next year because you dont think he'll be a good no.2 fantasy back next year. (He shared carries this year so thats not really an arguement.)
The Great Gambini wrote:Is there any reason to believe Willie Parker shouldn't be a decent number two in 12 teamers for next year? I can't think of one, can someone shed some light here?
I can think of one, and his name is Lendale White. If White falls to the Steelers there's no way they don't take him. FWP is too small to run as many times as the Steelers do. Also, he's too small to run inside the 10, something the Steelers typically do on First/Second and Goal.