NO WAY TO and Moss could co-exist. Especially for all of his faults, TO does actually try every down, and will block etc, take end arounds etc.
I hate Owens, but I don't think he respects people who don't take training and effort as seriously as he does. I mean seriously, in order to stand out, you had to train on par with jerry rice in san fran.
The opening scene of the movie "Saving Private Ryan" is loosely based on games of dodgeball Brian Dawkins played in second grade.
I couldn't stand to see TO in Blue and Silver (ours, not Detroit's). I mean, I know there's about a 99% chance of it happening now that we've cut MeShawn, but still...
For one thing, I might have to change my avatar. It would look a little weird. Also, he might cause conflict, and I can't see Tuna putting up with that. Anyone remember Antonio Bryant? You know, the awesome young talent we had until he had a hissy fit and threw a jersey at Tuna? Now he's a 9er...
I know that bastard's on his way, and the only way I could possibly feel NEUTRAL about this is if we sign him to a small, incentive-laden contract. Probably won't happen though.
TO will flourish in either of Denver, KC, or Dallas. All veteran QB's who are proven. Tough coaches too. These three teams will make a pitch for him.
What about Seattle? They cut Jurevicious, need a 2nd WR to complement Jackson, and they have tons of cap space given they probably won't resign Hutchinson.
I think Holmgren should grow some balls and take the risk.
I would be STUNNED if Holmgren or anyone on his coaching Tree took him. You don't think Holmgren and His protege talked about this at all?
He will "flourish" for a year. If he can't play with donovan, putting up monster stats and going to the super bowl, how is he going to like some of those qb's?
The opening scene of the movie "Saving Private Ryan" is loosely based on games of dodgeball Brian Dawkins played in second grade.
eaglesrule wrote: He will "flourish" for a year. If he can't play with donovan, putting up monster stats and going to the super bowl, how is he going to like some of those qb's?
I'm not entirely convinced that McNabb is a better QB than T. Green, J. Plummer, and even Drew (statue) Bledsoe.
Good offensive lines, good (even great) running games. TO WILL flourish with either one of the three.
Last edited by fantasizing on Tue Mar 14, 2006 9:54 pm, edited 2 times in total.
eaglesrule wrote: He will "flourish" for a year. If he can't play with donovan, putting up monster stats and going to the super bowl, how is he going to like some of those qb's?
I'm not entirely convinced that McNabb is a better QB than T. Green, J. Plummer, and even Drew (statue) Bledsoe. Good offensive lines, good (even great) running games. TO WILL flourish with either one of the three.
Let's not be silly. I don't want to open up the typical can here, but you do know that Donovan is the only QB ever that put up 30 td's and 10 or less int's right? You know Donovan's playoff resume far exceeds either of those? Donovan also helmed the team that until this year won the most games since 2000. He has also been to the Super Bowl. I may be overly eager to defend him here, but it is patently ridiculous to say that Plummer is better. Green is a different story, but I think Donovan has done more with less than either of them. Green is a solid QB, but I would highly doubt that any GM who has Green wouldn't take a straight up trade for Donovan if presented the opportunity. You do know plummer is 77 all time in career passer rating, donovan is 20? It seems to me that green has a lot of empty stats, but I guess that isn't his fault. To say that plummer is comprable is totally looking at fantasy TOO much however.
The opening scene of the movie "Saving Private Ryan" is loosely based on games of dodgeball Brian Dawkins played in second grade.