Good info, TBM!
I knew this wasn’t a case the Supremes were looking at frivolously. I didn’t know the specifics, but I knew that it had the potential to break some legal ground, which is why they heard it.
I can see both the Son’s and ANS’ point of view on this. If the old man wanted her to have some of his money she should have some of his money – it was HIS to dispense with, not the Son’s. Where the Son is coming from is that she’s a gold-digger just in it for the cash, and that would really rankle me if I were him.
Still, how much money does he need? He inherited hundreds of millions, if not billions, if I recall correctly.