Mecedes Lewis tid bit; Jaguars leading receiver poll

[mattb47]

Here are the 2004 NFL Draft Countdown WR Rankings:

2004 WR's

1. Larry Fitzgerald, Pittsburgh
2. Roy Williams, Texas
3. Mike Williams, U.S.C.
4. Reggie Williams, Washington
5. Rashaun Woods, Oklahoma St.
6. Michael Clayton, Louisiana St.
7. Lee Evans, Wisconsin
8. Michael Jenkins, Ohio St.
9. Keary Colbert, U.S.C.
10. Devard Darling, Washington St.
11. Devery Henderson, Louisiana St.
12. P.K. Sam, Florida St.
13. Ernest Wilford, Virginia Tech
14. Derrick Hamilton, Clemson
15. Bernard Berrian, Fresno St.

What's your point CC? Are you saying that Wilford isn't good because he was ranked so low 2 years ago? Or smirking that Reggie Williams is on that list at 4?

He was posting that because someone had said that Wilford was the #4 rated WR in that draft, and he was probably posting that to refute him. I don't remember who it was but it seems they edited it out of their post.

And to infer that Wilford is going to post as good or better numbers than Jimmy Smith has been for years is a little optimistic I think. I think he can post reasonable numbers, but I think it is likely that both him and Matt Jones post solid numbers rather than one posting huge numbers.

[Patriot Reign]

Here are the 2004 NFL Draft Countdown WR Rankings:

2004 WR's

1. Larry Fitzgerald, Pittsburgh
2. Roy Williams, Texas
3. Mike Williams, U.S.C.
4. Reggie Williams, Washington
5. Rashaun Woods, Oklahoma St.
6. Michael Clayton, Louisiana St.
7. Lee Evans, Wisconsin
8. Michael Jenkins, Ohio St.
9. Keary Colbert, U.S.C.
10. Devard Darling, Washington St.
11. Devery Henderson, Louisiana St.
12. P.K. Sam, Florida St.
13. Ernest Wilford, Virginia Tech
14. Derrick Hamilton, Clemson
15. Bernard Berrian, Fresno St.

What's your point CC? Are you saying that Wilford isn't good because he was ranked so low 2 years ago? Or smirking that Reggie Williams is on that list at 4?

He was posting that because someone had said that Wilford was the #4 rated WR in that draft, and he was probably posting that to refute him. I don't remember who it was but it seems they edited it out of their post.

And to infer that Wilford is going to post as good or better numbers than Jimmy Smith has been for years is a little optimistic I think. I think he can post reasonable numbers, but I think it is likely that both him and Matt Jones post solid numbers rather than one posting huge numbers.

It was Keyser! lol. He edited it out rather than owning up to his error.

The Steeler fans might not rat you out Keyser but the Patriots one sure will!

[Keyser_WV]

Here are the 2004 NFL Draft Countdown WR Rankings:

2004 WR's

1. Larry Fitzgerald, Pittsburgh
2. Roy Williams, Texas
3. Mike Williams, U.S.C.
4. Reggie Williams, Washington
5. Rashaun Woods, Oklahoma St.
6. Michael Clayton, Louisiana St.
7. Lee Evans, Wisconsin
8. Michael Jenkins, Ohio St.
9. Keary Colbert, U.S.C.
10. Devard Darling, Washington St.
11. Devery Henderson, Louisiana St.
12. P.K. Sam, Florida St.
13. Ernest Wilford, Virginia Tech
14. Derrick Hamilton, Clemson
15. Bernard Berrian, Fresno St.

What's your point CC? Are you saying that Wilford isn't good because he was ranked so low 2 years ago? Or smirking that Reggie Williams is on that list at 4?

He was posting that because someone had said that Wilford was the #4 rated WR in that draft, and he was probably posting that to refute him. I don't remember who it was but it seems they edited it out of their post.

And to infer that Wilford is going to post as good or better numbers than Jimmy Smith has been for years is a little optimistic I think. I think he can post reasonable numbers, but I think it is likely that both him and Matt Jones post solid numbers rather than one posting huge numbers.

It was Keyser! lol. He edited it out rather than owning up to his error.

The Steeler fans might not rat you out Keyser but the Patriots one sure will!

I admit that I mixed up Williams and Wilford, no biggie. Wasn't trying to hide anything as you suggest.

To me it was easier to just edit my post.

Rat me out?? Whatever man.

[moochman]

I don't see Wilford being anywhere near as productive as you think, Keyser. The simple fact is that they are trying out two TE sets so they can run more. That plus Lefty's inconsistancy will keep any Jag WRs far from the top ten.

[confused_jake]

wow, i know where i can't post my opinion anymore

[mattb47]

wow, i know where i can't post my opinion anymore

You have anything to back the statement up at all? Jimmy Smith wasn't even top 10, and I don't see him being even as good as Smith.

[confused_jake]

nothing statistical, but from the games i've watched, wilford has showed great potential. now that he will most likely be the #1 target this year i think he will have a breakout year.

[UNDEFEATED]

i was a wilford owner last season.

The guy did have 7 tds last season. He was my #3 guy at times.

He may not have gotten the yardage but the TDs were there.

[Dr. Duran Duran]

Hey, who knows. Maybe we'll all be eating crow in several months if Wilford breaks out. I just don't see Wilford busting out with the core offense being so young. Wilford will have to do alot of the work without the presence of a go-to guy like Smith and it's not like the fellas around him are going to make it any easier on him. Matt Jones is still a project and Reggie Williams has been a major bust.

[mattb47]

nothing statistical, but from the games i've watched, wilford has showed great potential. now that he will most likely be the #1 target this year i think he will have a breakout year.

Breaking out and top 10 are completely different things. Top 10 means that he is better than at least 2 of these guys next year:

S. Smith
Holt
CJ
TO
Moss
Harrison
Fitz
Boldin
D-Jax
Wayne
Chambers
Ward

I really don't see that happening, I think it is reasonable for him to breakout, but top 10 is very unlikely I think.