Can you manipulate Yahoo! to do this kind of league?

[Sticky Spice]

I was looking at the league they're doing in Fantasy Football Index mag. 12-team, 22 rds or so, no transactions, no lineups/best ball, and you play all the other teams each week.

What would it take to do a league like this on yahoo?

Is the commissioner allowed to go back and change lineups AFTER the games are played? This would take care of best ball scoring. I think this would be the clincher.

As for record - you'd have to keep track of that yourself and post the standings on the message board. Awkward, but functional.

See any flaws?

[mbuser]

Is the commissioner allowed to go back and change lineups AFTER the games are played?

i'll just comment on this aspect -- in custom leagues, the commish can edit past lineups at any time, and the stats/records will automatically update retroactively after the changes are made

[Vixtor]

What do you mean play every team each week? Why not just points only?

[Sticky Spice]

Good question. I'll read the article again to see if they explain. But one good thing about playing every other team every week is that consistency would be rewarded. Also, I love head-to-head and this way you don't totally lose the head-to-head aspect of it. In roto-style points league if you are way behind halfway through the season you have nothing to look forward to. In head-to-head you could have the worst record in the league and still sweep everyone that week.

I think it sounds like a blast and adds all kinds of interesting strategy to how you would draft your team.

[Dan Lambskin]

i cant tell if this sounds like a SURVIVOR League or not...bascially you draft a team, no lineup changes and lowest scoring team each week is voted off

...not sure if Yahoo can do that though, but it's a fun twist