When Faulk comes back, RBBC in St. Louis?

[Guest]

I know it is very early to speculate, but let's face it, Faulk hasn't looked good at all. Gordon has filled in quite nicely, especially against SF. So when Faulk is healthy, would you fear a RBBC in St.Louis?

[Challie]

This is the most premature message I've seen here. Who knows?

[Andy1234]

I would Doubt it, but these days who knows.

I'm just waiting for a QBBC, like they do with the Ducks in Oregon. That will give us fantasy geeks one more thing to complain about.

[Pompous Ass]

If Gordan is doing extremly well,Why put that old washed up man back in......Faulk should stay as back-up,His glory days are well behind him.

[culboarder]

I know it is very early to speculate, but let's face it, Faulk hasn't looked good at all. Gordon has filled in quite nicely, especially against SF. So when Faulk is healthy, would you fear a RBBC in St.Louis?

uhhh NO!

[M_Zimm_ffc]

I know it is very early to speculate, but let's face it, Faulk hasn't looked good at all. Gordon has filled in quite nicely, especially against SF. So when Faulk is healthy, would you fear a RBBC in St.Louis?

I seriously doubt it. I don't think Martz would bench their "top" RB. And I would be surprised if Gordon does really good for these 6 weeks.

[brdmaverick]

well, after Martz went with Warner even when Bulger clearly outplayed him, I would think that he would do the same with a Faulk/Gordon situation.

[culboarder]

well, after Martz went with Warner even when Bulger clearly outplayed him, I would think that he would do the same with a Faulk/Gordon situation.

you cant compare Marshall Faulk to a guy like Warner, that is like an insult.....faulk is way better than that. and he still is the RAms best player and theres no way gordon will overtake him.

[Ousmagic]

i guarentee lamar gordon wont be half as good as faulk was

[Cambodian]

sorry to sound un-intellegent, but what's RBBC or QBBC? Thanks guys!!