That's okay, we'll take our national championships and all those heismans we've won recently while you're still sadly basing everything off one game.
There's never been a Pac-10/SEC debate as far as I can remember. And besides, CAL isn't the 2nd best team in the Pac-10. But if you actually bothered to research the topic, you'd know that.
Sandrock
Head Coach
Posts: 1422
Joined: 1 Sep 2004
Yards this season: 0
Home Cafe: Football
Location: Reser Stadium; lamenting the D-Line for 2011
Sandrock wrote:That's okay, we'll take our national championships and all those heismans we've won recently while you're still sadly basing everything off one game.
Off of the one team that the OP mentioned would be competitive in the SEC, so I don't see your point.
Get back to me when you've got more than 1 team to talk about.
And no, there never was a Pac-10 vs. SEC argument, there was only a is the Pac-10 a total joke outside of USC argument, which the obvious answer is of course yes.
Sandrock wrote:That's okay, we'll take our national championships and all those heismans we've won recently while you're still sadly basing everything off one game.
Off of the one team that the OP mentioned would be competitive in the SEC, so I don't see your point.
Get back to me when you've got more than 1 team to talk about.
And no, there never was a Pac-10 vs. SEC argument, there was only a is the Pac-10 a total joke outside of USC argument, which the obvious answer is of course yes.
Get back to you? You imply that I think your opinion is worth anything.......I don't. Less than nothing in fact.
Yes I realize that the SEC is the best conference in the country. However, the Pac-10 is always competitive in the 3 major sports and is continually snubbed and sold short. So when I see pathetic posts like the ops, of course I have to comment. Go back to your little fantasy worlds, congrats you have the best conference and congrats on being pathetic enough to have to continually rub it in everyones face.
Sandrock
Head Coach
Posts: 1422
Joined: 1 Sep 2004
Yards this season: 0
Home Cafe: Football
Location: Reser Stadium; lamenting the D-Line for 2011
Sandrock wrote:That's okay, we'll take our national championships and all those heismans we've won recently while you're still sadly basing everything off one game.
Off of the one team that the OP mentioned would be competitive in the SEC, so I don't see your point.
Get back to me when you've got more than 1 team to talk about.
And no, there never was a Pac-10 vs. SEC argument, there was only a is the Pac-10 a total joke outside of USC argument, which the obvious answer is of course yes.
Get back to you? You imply that I think your opinion is worth anything.......I don't. Less than nothing in fact.
Yes I realize that the SEC is the best conference in the country. However, the Pac-10 is always competitive in the 3 major sports and is continually snubbed and sold short. So when I see pathetic posts like the ops, of course I have to comment. Go back to your little fantasy worlds, congrats you have the best conference and congrats on being pathetic enough to have to continually rub it in everyones face.
looks like someone needs a cold beverage to get that bitter taste out of their mouth....
Sandrock wrote:That's okay, we'll take our national championships and all those heismans we've won recently while you're still sadly basing everything off one game.
There's never been a Pac-10/SEC debate as far as I can remember. And besides, CAL isn't the 2nd best team in the Pac-10. But if you actually bothered to research the topic, you'd know that.
I did research the topic. Going into Saturday USC was ranked higher than Cal, with Cal being the second-highest ranked Pac-10 team. Done.
ChampionshipS??? One-peat is only one championship, last time I checked.