Which Seattle WR will put up the best #'s?

[freeling_prideful]

By the end of the season DJax will have the best numbers. But he'll put up the bulk of those in the last half of the season. I see him being more of a co-No. 1 or even a No. 2 option for at least the first 6 weeks as he gets that knee stronger.

He'll look like a bust by mid-season, but I think he'll start showing us the skills afterwards.

[Kilroy]

This week it'll be Engram. For the Season:

1.) DJax
2.) Engram
3.) Busteson

[9er Fan]

Did they really pay Burleson $49 mil over 7 years (with a $5+ million signing bonus) to be a #3 WR? If so, they should fire the GM.

[awwchrist]

Did they really pay Burleson $49 mil over 7 years (with a $5+ million signing bonus) to be a #3 WR? If so, they should fire the GM.

1. This isn't Madden. You can't just look at the numbers and assume the contract will be a burden for the full/amount duration. Besides, we're still almost 10 mil under the cap. Gotta spend it.

2. #3? Jackson's health is dubious and Engram isn't getting any younger.

3. You wish your team was in the position of overspending.

#59 looks awesome. Worth every penny.

[9er Fan]

Did they really pay Burleson $49 mil over 7 years (with a $5+ million signing bonus) to be a #3 WR? If so, they should fire the GM.

1. This isn't Madden. You can't just look at the numbers and assume the contract will be a burden for the full/amount duration. Besides, we're still almost 10 mil under the cap. Gotta spend it.

2. #3? Jackson's health is dubious and Engram isn't getting any younger.

3. You wish your team was in the position of overspending.

#59 looks awesome. Worth every penny.

The point I was trying to make is not that it was a bad signing necessarily, but that (one would hope) the Seahawks envision using Burleson as more than just a #3 WR based on the size of the contract. Basically agreeing with your point #2.