geez, people are overreacting to just one game. reggie williams will always be 3rd on the depth chart. matt jones is the guy in that offense, with wilford a semi-close second.
Kudos to Leber for the amazing sig and to Metroid for the userbar and making them both fit 2008 and 2009 Defunct Dynasty League Champion
steelerfan513 wrote:geez, people are overreacting to just one game. reggie williams will always be 3rd on the depth chart. matt jones is the guy in that offense, with wilford a semi-close second.
there was an AP story earlier in the off-season which talked about williams' demotion from a starter because he was 'non-existent' in camp. he was supposed to be the guy that stepped up this season, but was subsequently demoted to WR3. like i said, the only talk you ever hear about williams' potential is that he's never come close to realizing it. wilford out-played and bumped williams down on the depth chart last season, too
and not sure what you guys are looking at, but according to NFL.com play-by-play jones had 9 targets, williams had 7, taylor had 6, and wilford and wrighster had 5
As a Jaguar fan, who travels a bit to go to all of their home games, I would say the following.
1-for all intents and purposes it will be a WRBC situation. NONE of them is likely to become a clear cut #1 on a regular basis unless one of them becomes more or less Leftwhich's 'go to guy' that he looks for when he really needs it. As of now, none of them seems to have done that. Wolford seems to have a SLIGHT edge there when it comes to just 'seeming to come up with a play' though he is CLEARLY the least physically gifted of them all.
2-all of our WR are the same in many ways.
NONE of them is going to run away from anyone on a regular basis and 'create space' to get open on a regular basis
All three of them however, CAN and DO catch the ball in traffic,ESPECIALLY if it is a 'go up and get it, JUMP ball'.
If I HAD to rank them I would say as follows.
Big play(ie; most likely to get a 40- 50 yard reception)
1-matt jones
significant dropoff
2-Reggie williams
significant drop
3-Wolford
Most catches/throw to's
1-Matt jones(55-60rec) 800 yards
2-Wolford(45-50) 600yards
3-R.Williams(38-45)450 yards
4th and 8 / or near the endzone:
1-Wolford
slight drop off
2-M.Jones
SIGNIFICANT drop off
Williams.
Bottom line: I would say any of them would be worth a flier as a bye week #3 WR, or injury replacement. NONE of them should be counted on as a #2 fantsay WR though.
Overall I would rank them as Jones then Wolford, then a good ways behind R.Williams.
Keep an eye on Marcedes Lewis if this injury doesnt linger. He is a Rookie TE who I think could be a very nice surprise sleeper.
Just my opinion, hope it helps ,though I know I didnt clear anything up to say the least.
INKcogKNEEdough wrote:As a Jaguar fan, who travels a bit to go to all of their home games, I would say the following.
1-for all intents and purposes it will be a WRBC situation. NONE of them is likely to become a clear cut #1 on a regular basis unless one of them becomes more or less Leftwhich's 'go to guy' that he looks for when he really needs it. As of now, none of them seems to have done that. Wolford seems to have a SLIGHT edge there when it comes to just 'seeming to come up with a play' though he is CLEARLY the least physically gifted of them all.
2-all of our WR are the same in many ways.
NONE of them is going to run away from anyone on a regular basis and 'create space' to get open on a regular basis
All three of them however, CAN and DO catch the ball in traffic,ESPECIALLY if it is a 'go up and get it, JUMP ball'.
If I HAD to rank them I would say as follows.
Big play(ie; most likely to get a 40- 50 yard reception)
1-matt jones
significant dropoff
2-Reggie williams
significant drop
3-Wolford
Most catches/throw to's
1-Matt jones(55-60rec) 800 yards
2-Wolford(45-50) 600yards
3-R.Williams(38-45)450 yards
4th and 8 / or near the endzone:
1-Wolford
slight drop off
2-M.Jones
SIGNIFICANT drop off
Williams.
Bottom line: I would say any of them would be worth a flier as a bye week #3 WR, or injury replacement. NONE of them should be counted on as a #2 fantsay WR though.
Overall I would rank them as Jones then Wolford, then a good ways behind R.Williams.
Keep an eye on Marcedes Lewis if this injury doesnt linger. He is a Rookie TE who I think could be a very nice surprise sleeper.
Just my opinion, hope it helps ,though I know I didnt clear anything up to say the least.
INKcogKNEEdough
NO. Those numbers WILL be higher. You can expect one either Jones or Williams to have over 1000 receiving yards.
Look at Jimmy Smith's number with Leftwich. Del Rio will past just as much as he did the last (2) season.
Jimmy Smith 2005 70 REP 1023 YARDS and 6 TD
2004 74 REP 1172 YARDS and 6 TD
Leftwich will make a 1000 receiver on (1) of the (2) players.