Time to drop Michael Robinson

[DbacksAllTheWay]

I own Michael, but he has been a huge disappointment and couldn't even get it into the endzone yesterday. I added him for Berrian , and my team has now lost 3 weeks in a row. Is there any reason to keep this guy?

[GMoney]

The only reason to have micheal robinson on a roster is if you are a Gore owner and you are worried about him getting hurt and need the SF RB production.

[RJ24VC15]

He should never have been on your team to start with.

[kev8821]

I picked him up too, but there are better waiver wire picks and Gore was very solid this weekend.

[mrblitz]

Drop him like a bad habit.

[skinsfan]

I didn't know there was a time to add him, really.

[Pete123444]

Dynasty leagues only should have him. And I'm startin to wonder if he needs to be there.......

[The Black Mamba]

How quickly things change. Not long ago ppl were adding MR based on WR/RB eligibility and possibility of being a goalline back due to Gores fumbilitis on the goal line. Even a thread about if it was ethically ok to put him at the WR spot if I recall.

To those who said there never was a time to add him, well a couple weeks ago he was a decent "flavor of the week" pickup, he hasn't put up anything noteworthy so obviously not a bad idea to drop him, but he did merit a roster spot IMO.

Dropping him for Berrian was a good move, only question...how was he still a FA?

[kev8821]

There was a buzz about adding Robinson when Gore fumbled and go hurt in the Eagles game and his RB/WR elgibility was a nice bonus. I didn't have to give up much to grab him and I handcuffed him with Gore.

[Crippler]

Anyone who didnt consider adding him to your team almost missed out on a great opportunity. If a goal-line RB who fills in often for Gore (if he continued to fumble) can play in the WR slot, thats pretty huge.

Unfortunately, hindsight is 20/20 so we're all acting like geniuses