knapplc wrote:OK, every single person responding to this thread has commented on the St. Pauli Girl.
Met, if you have any more pictures of her, I think you're obligated by The Code of Manhood to post them (as long as they're respectable - you have an obligation to The Code of Responsibility, too).
Well, I know I would love it if someone posted pictures of my fiance on the web... as long as they're respectable.
He posted one already and you didn't have a problem with it. Why do you have a problem with more?
Because everyone is drooling over her now, that's why.
So if we didn't find her good-looking, that would be ok?
knapplc wrote:OK, every single person responding to this thread has commented on the St. Pauli Girl.
Met, if you have any more pictures of her, I think you're obligated by The Code of Manhood to post them (as long as they're respectable - you have an obligation to The Code of Responsibility, too).
Well, I know I would love it if someone posted pictures of my fiance on the web... as long as they're respectable.
He posted one already and you didn't have a problem with it. Why do you have a problem with more?
Because everyone is drooling over her now, that's why.
So if we didn't find her good-looking, that would be ok?
Ok, let's say someone posted a picture of your wife on a website and she was in a group photo. Not a big deal, and I agree. Ok, now let's say that the guys on the website thought she looked hot and asked for more pictures of her. Would you want your friend to accomodate them and post MORE pictures of your wife on-line so that they can drool over her?
Maybe you wouldn't mind if it was your wife, but I would mind if it was mine.
knapplc wrote:OK, every single person responding to this thread has commented on the St. Pauli Girl.
Met, if you have any more pictures of her, I think you're obligated by The Code of Manhood to post them (as long as they're respectable - you have an obligation to The Code of Responsibility, too).
Well, I know I would love it if someone posted pictures of my fiance on the web... as long as they're respectable.
He posted one already and you didn't have a problem with it. Why do you have a problem with more?
Because everyone is drooling over her now, that's why.
So if we didn't find her good-looking, that would be ok?
Ok, let's say someone posted a picture of your wife on a website and she was in a group photo. Not a big deal, and I agree. Ok, now let's say that the guys on the website thought she looked hot and asked for more pictures of her. Would you want your friend to accomodate them and post MORE pictures of your wife on-line?
Maybe you wouldn't mind if it was your wife, but I would mind if it was mine.
I assume this girl knows this picture was taken - she seemed to pose for it. Assuming that she knew she was posing for the picture, you would also reasonably assume that she knew people would look at it. If not, I doubt she would have posed for a picture.
I suppose you don't look at a pretty girl that walks by on the street?
Alkaholik wrote:Hey Metroid, where did you get that Crunk Cup?
I tried making my own with some chrome spray paint and tiny diamond shaped mirror, but nowhere near to Lil Jon's, like i wanted....
I got that cup at International Imports, its like a novelty store. Its actually a Scarface cup, on one side it says the world is yours and on the other it has the letters T.M.. I dont remember Tony having a crunk cup in Scarface but it worked for my costume.
As far as posting more pics of the St. Paulie Girl, that aint gonna happen. The only reason I posted that one is because we were both in costume and I thought it was a funny pic and knew she wouldnt mind. I'm sure shes not too worried about cool pic of her in costume with Lil' Jon being on the internet since she posted very similar pics on her myspace page.
knapplc wrote:I assume this girl knows this picture was taken - she seemed to pose for it. Assuming that she knew she was posing for the picture, you would also reasonably assume that she knew people would look at it. If not, I doubt she would have posed for a picture.
I suppose you don't look at a pretty girl that walks by on the street?
So you're saying that any good looking girl that poses for pictures at a private party should expect her friends to post them on-line AND that her husband/fiance will be fine with it?
How does looking at a pretty girl walking down the street have anything at all to do with posting pictures of your friend's fiance on-line so that people can gawk at her? You would really post pictures of your friend's wife on-line?
knapplc wrote:I assume this girl knows this picture was taken - she seemed to pose for it. Assuming that she knew she was posing for the picture, you would also reasonably assume that she knew people would look at it. If not, I doubt she would have posed for a picture.
I suppose you don't look at a pretty girl that walks by on the street?
So you're saying that any good looking girl that poses for pictures at a private party should expect her friends to post them on-line AND that her husband/fiance will be fine with it?
How does looking at a pretty girl walking down the street have anything at all to do with posting pictures of your friend's fiance on-line so that people can gawk at her? You would really post pictures of your friend's wife on-line?
That's really suprising, actually.
You have to remember I'm in that pic as well. And I know she wouldnt mind me posting it. I would never post pics of just her anywhere on the web, that would be very inconsiderate.
knapplc wrote:I assume this girl knows this picture was taken - she seemed to pose for it. Assuming that she knew she was posing for the picture, you would also reasonably assume that she knew people would look at it. If not, I doubt she would have posed for a picture.
I suppose you don't look at a pretty girl that walks by on the street?
So you're saying that any good looking girl that poses for pictures at a private party should expect her friends to post them on-line AND that her husband/fiance will be fine with it?
How does looking at a pretty girl walking down the street have anything at all to do with posting pictures of your friend's fiance on-line so that people can gawk at her? You would really post pictures of your friend's wife on-line?
That's really suprising, actually.
You have to remember I'm in that pic as well. And I know she wouldnt mind me posting it. I would never post pics of just her anywhere on the web, that would be very inconsiderate.
knapplc wrote:I assume this girl knows this picture was taken - she seemed to pose for it. Assuming that she knew she was posing for the picture, you would also reasonably assume that she knew people would look at it. If not, I doubt she would have posed for a picture.
I suppose you don't look at a pretty girl that walks by on the street?
So you're saying that any good looking girl that poses for pictures at a private party should expect her friends to post them on-line AND that her husband/fiance will be fine with it?
How does looking at a pretty girl walking down the street have anything at all to do with posting pictures of your friend's fiance on-line so that people can gawk at her? You would really post pictures of your friend's wife on-line?
That's really suprising, actually.
You have to remember I'm in that pic as well. And I know she wouldnt mind me posting it. I would never post pics of just her anywhere on the web, that would be very inconsiderate.
I know dude, I don't think you did anything wrong at all. If you would have succumbed and posted additional pictures of your friend than you would have, but it's obvious you recognized that it wasn't cool.