vitalogist wrote:potential card alert, there petedog... nice wish, though.
Yeah, I wondered about that too.
There are no cuss words or anything that I could see that would make that card worthy. Hell, we had 20+ pages of should I bang my co-worker complete with pics going on. This IMO is nowhere near that... If they want me to take it down then whatever. Its a joke, nothing more...
Last edited by petedog9 on Thu Dec 07, 2006 1:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
vitalogist wrote:potential card alert, there petedog... nice wish, though.
Yeah, I wondered about that too.
There are no cuss words or anything that I could see that would make that card worthy. Hell, we had 20+ pages of should I bang my co-worker complete with pics going on. This IMO is nowhere near that... If they want me to take it down then whatever. Its a joke, nothing more...
It's not your opinion or my opinion that matters, though - it's the opinion of the Mods. It's just fair warning. The "oral sex" reference alone is pushing the boundaries.
vitalogist wrote:potential card alert, there petedog... nice wish, though.
Yeah, I wondered about that too.
There are no cuss words or anything that I could see that would make that card worthy. Hell, we had 20+ pages of should I bang my co-worker complete with pics going on. This IMO is nowhere near that... If they want me to take it down then whatever. Its a joke, nothing more...
It's not your opinion or my opinion that matters, though - it's the opinion of the Mods. It's just fair warning. The "oral sex" reference alone is pushing the boundaries.
Since nobody's opinion but yours matters, then feel free to police away. But I guess I am a little confused...How is that worse then the whole thread about the guy getting advice about boning and 3-waying with his co-worker thread (complete with leg and chest pics) or the Kramer thread full on "N" words and "F" bombs or the multiple hot chicks threads with pages upon pages of women wearing little or no clothing??? Just trying to define where the line in the sand here is... Its a picture of a remote control with the word "sex" on it....
vitalogist wrote:potential card alert, there petedog... nice wish, though.
Yeah, I wondered about that too.
There are no cuss words or anything that I could see that would make that card worthy. Hell, we had 20+ pages of should I bang my co-worker complete with pics going on. This IMO is nowhere near that... If they want me to take it down then whatever. Its a joke, nothing more...
It's not your opinion or my opinion that matters, though - it's the opinion of the Mods. It's just fair warning. The "oral sex" reference alone is pushing the boundaries.
Since nobody's opinion but yours matters, then feel free to police away. But I guess I am a little confused...How is that worse then the whole thread about the guy getting advice about boning and 3-waying with his co-worker thread (complete with leg and chest pics) or the Kramer thread full on "N" words and "F" bombs or the multiple hot chicks threads with pages upon pages of women wearing little or no clothing??? Just trying to define where the line in the sand here is... Its a picture of a remote control with the word "sex" on it....
reread Knapplcs post before you shoot your mouth off.
I dont think this is a big deal, If the mods thought it was it would have already been taken care of. Case closed.
vitalogist wrote:potential card alert, there petedog... nice wish, though.
Yeah, I wondered about that too.
There are no cuss words or anything that I could see that would make that card worthy. Hell, we had 20+ pages of should I bang my co-worker complete with pics going on. This IMO is nowhere near that... If they want me to take it down then whatever. Its a joke, nothing more...
It's not your opinion or my opinion that matters, though - it's the opinion of the Mods. It's just fair warning. The "oral sex" reference alone is pushing the boundaries.
Since nobody's opinion but yours matters, then feel free to police away. But I guess I am a little confused...How is that worse then the whole thread about the guy getting advice about boning and 3-waying with his co-worker thread (complete with leg and chest pics) or the Kramer thread full on "N" words and "F" bombs or the multiple hot chicks threads with pages upon pages of women wearing little or no clothing??? Just trying to define where the line in the sand here is... Its a picture of a remote control with the word "sex" on it....
reread Knapplcs post before you shoot your mouth off.
I dont think this is a big deal, If the mods thought it was it would have already been taken care of. Case closed.
What he said.
I'm not coming down on you, Pete. I think it's a funny enough pic, and you're right - there are other things on the Cafe that are probably in someone's opinion much worse. I'm just giving you some free advice. It's worth the paper it's printed on, and you're welcome to disregard it. But don't think I'm coming down on you. I'm not.
Then why all the drama (warnings) if its not over the line? He was giving me a little crap with the "Your opinion doesnt matter"'. . I took it with a grain of salt and gave some back in the same spirit...
I am not shooting my mouth off, rather asking a legit question. If that pciture is pushing the boundaries, how are the threads I mentionned not? That is a legit question as the boundaries seem to be a bit cloudy if this is the case.
EDIT***
I saw youtr post knapplc after I posted mine. But serious man, I never saw any warnings in those other threads that go way further then a silly little remote control that was a joke....
Im over it and I will delete it if its really that bad. Its just disconcerning that my remote is inappropreiate and 100+ pages of naked women or the "Should I 3 way with my co-worker"is not... How does that make sense?
Last edited by petedog9 on Thu Dec 07, 2006 2:29 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Cafe Home
Fantasy Baseball
Fantasy Basketball
Fantasy Hockey
by joelamosobadiah » Wed Dec 06, 2006 7:03 pm 
