BeefSandwiches wrote: TEAM A - beat Team B twice, beat Team C twice TEAM B - beat Team C twice TEAM C - beat Team D twice TEAM D - beat Team A twice
a, d, b, c
1. Team A is first because it has the most divisional wins (beating B and C twice)
2. Team D comes in second because he beat the #1 team (Team A).
3. Team B comes in third, because team B and C are left, and Team B beat Team C twice.
4. Thus Team C is forth.
That's how I would do it based off the information you provided.
That logic is fine but it's not considering Head to Head record, but rather most divisional wins, or who beat you consider the #1 team or whatever. Really, the answer is: the winner cannot be determined from this situation by going by Head to Head. You go to your next tiebreaker.
Matthias wrote:That logic is fine but it's not considering Head to Head record, but rather most divisional wins, or who beat you consider the #1 team or whatever. Really, the answer is: the winner cannot be determined from this situation by going by Head to Head. You go to your next tiebreaker.
This is what I figured I would have to do, but I wanted to get some other opinions on it. I don't think there is any choice to use anything except the next tie-breaker.
"I'm normally not a praying man, but if you're up there, please save me Superman."
- Homer J. Simpson
I think it should be decided by record against the division personally. It is how it is done in most leagues that use divisions to break up the league and it would be the most fair deciding factor I think. If that is still a wash then go with most points. It doesn't matter what you choose, someone will be upset about it, so just go with one and stick with it.