Should This Trade be Vetoed?

[NEPatsFan2006]

Team A gave up Larry Fitzgerald and NEPats D.
Team B gave up C. Benson, E. Kennison, Pitt D and a 3rd round draft pick next year.

None of these players will be kept but should this trade be vetoed?? I need some input. I know Larry Fitz will be a stud WR for years to come but this season his numbers are not that great with the exception of last week.
Give me your thoughts.

[JasonSeahorn]

nah it can go through.

[Blackhawk]

It doesn't look like something that should be vetoed, unless you know there is collusion to get team A to the playoffs, championship, etc.

[mrblitz]

I agree, unless their is collusion. It is really not vetoable.

[BrutallyHuge]

Looks fine.

[slowride]

Not even close to vetoable.

[RugbyD]

A-OK

[Plindsey88]

About as even as it gets...

NE = Pittsburgh
Fitz >>>> Kennison

Benson and 3rd rounder makes up the difference between Kennison and Fitz...

Why would this be even remotely close to collusion?

[steelerfan513]

nope, definitely not vetoable.

[NEPatsFan2006]

well I was team B and this trade got vetoed in my league. I thought that it was a fair trade and that other teams were just trying to prevent my team from improving going into the playoffs. I ended up exchanging the 3rd round pick for a 2nd and now I think that trade will be vetoed as well. My league is usually pretty fair and knowledgeable, but this time I believe that they are a bit out of line. they are all saying that this trade was awful. Team A is not going to make the playoffs and just wants an extra draft pick next year in exchange for Fitz.

anyone have any ideas of how I can get this through using the same players and any of my draft picks? please help deadline is tomorrow.