Okay boys, let's get this going.
Wear the bag until Superbowl Sunday.
I think Chicago is nothing like the team that beat Seattle this year. Grossman was on fire and since then he sucks. The D is good, but they lost some key players. Their last three games were a loss to Green Bay and near losses to Detroit and Tampa.
Chicago is good, but the Seahawks move on to New Orleans.
Yo, Met... thanks for the sig! GO DUCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Truth is, both teams are hurting because of injuries, but I'd say that the Bears are hurting less than the Seahawks. Grossman may not have been playing as well as he had during September, but he's shaken off most of the funk that plagued him.
As for turnovers, guess who threw more interceptions in December.
Seahawks are gonna go limping back home after this weekend. And the losers wearing the bag until the SuperBowl is fine by me.
beanoX3 wrote:As for turnovers, guess who threw more interceptions in December.
Uh, Rex had 6 where Hasselbeck had 5. Furthermore, they had the same amount of TDs but Hasselbeck had more than 200 extra passing yards in December.
If we shut down your running game you guys are toast.
I'm in, but I want one of the Pap SBears fans to bet the bag until the first regular season game of 2007 with the your Location saying: "In the bag of shame until the 2007 season"
beanoX3 wrote:As for turnovers, guess who threw more interceptions in December.
Uh, Rex had 6 where Hasselbeck had 5. Furthermore, they had the same amount of TDs but Hasselbeck had more than 200 extra passing yards in December.
If we shut down your running game you guys are toast.
Heh, I forget to consider the last GB game. That game was more than meaningless for Rex, and he even admitted he didn't prepare for that game. Also have to consider that Rex sat out 3 quarters of play, but my main point was that Grossman hasn't been as erratic as some people think for the last month of the season.
For the most part, Rex doesn't concern me this upcoming Sunday.
beanoX3 wrote:As for turnovers, guess who threw more interceptions in December.
Uh, Rex had 6 where Hasselbeck had 5. Furthermore, they had the same amount of TDs but Hasselbeck had more than 200 extra passing yards in December.
If we shut down your running game you guys are toast.
Heh, I forget to consider the last GB game. That game was more than meaningless for Rex, and he even admitted he didn't prepare for that game. Also have to consider that Rex sat out 3 quarters of play, but my main point was that Grossman hasn't been as erratic as some people think for the last month of the season.
For the most part, Rex doesn't concern me this upcoming Sunday.
He must have not prepared for the Vikings game either.
Don't get me wrong, I'm plenty concerned about this game but I would much, much rather have Hasselbeck going into this one than Rex, or any of the Chicago QBs.
biju wrote:Don't get me wrong, I'm plenty concerned about this game but I would much, much rather have Hasselbeck going into this one than Rex, or any of the Chicago QBs.
Uh... me too!
GO SEAHAWKS!!!!!!
Yo, Met... thanks for the sig! GO DUCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by Vlad the Impaler_ffc » Tue Jan 09, 2007 6:13 pm
I'm in for ther Bears. I wont abandon them in their hour of need, but it does look like they peaked in September.
This game is all about Grossman. If Rex keeps the turnovers at 2 or under, the Bears will roll to the NFC Championship game. If he implodes again, the lame Seahawks will limp to the next round by default.